airfocus Erfahrungen
airfocus
Gesamtbewertung
Filtern nach
Untern. Größe
117 Bewertungen
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Überragende Priority Matrix und außergewöhnlicher Support
Bewertet am 23.6.2020
Vorteile
Airfocus hebt sich besonders durch die sehr ausgereifte UI von seinen Wettbewerbern ab. Nützlich ist die Priority Matrix, die oft interessante Erkenntnisse liefert. Im Alltag nutzen wir überwiegend die Timeline-Funktion, die viele Gliederungsoptionen bietet.
Hervorzuheben ist der überragende Support, der den Namen wirklich verdient.
Nachteile
Wünschenswert wären Check- bzw. To-Do-Listen innerhalb von Items.
- Branche: Internet
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
airfocus has really helped us prioritise and make the right product decisions in the last few...
Bewertet am 19.7.2018
Vorteile
One of my favorite things about airfocus was the setup process the wizard really guided me through it and I was able to easily setup the software the way I wanted to.
The bubble charts are a big help when it comes to discussing prioritization in-between teams when everyone has a different focus.
Nachteile
When I share a roadmap with a link, I would like to be able to set filters for the receiving persons view of the roadmap.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 7.0 /10
A great help for prioritizing your development roadmap
Bewertet am 23.6.2020
Our overall experience has been a fairly good one. Our team was pretty excited to see the voting...
Our overall experience has been a fairly good one. Our team was pretty excited to see the voting feature and the chart view. We thought it was helpful. Like I mentioned above, I believe it took me a little too much digging to figure out what to do after signing up.
Vorteile
The items and chart sections are my most frequently visited sections. I use the items view to see the prioritized list of projects and their scores and the chart view has been helpful to visualize and highlight the quick win projects.
Your integration with Asana (and other project management platforms) is brilliant. It helped us get our data in quickly which helps our adoption rate of your product, and it helps us be efficient because we don't have to update information in multiple spots
Nachteile
I think educating your customers could be improved. You may have a lot of helpful content, but it wasn't at the forefront of my onboarding experience. For our business we use ActiveCampaign for our email automations and we setup an "onboarding sequence" that gives our users a nugget of help each day for the first 7 days (during their trial) to educate them on how to setup their websites with us. Those emails have a video tutorial for each feature which seems to really help. We've learned that the more information the user inputs into our system, the more likely they are to continue using it, which reduces our churn greatly. It seems you have a great product but I would really like to understand it more so I get the value out of it.
Gründe für den Wechsel zu airfocus
It integrated with Asana and I liked the interface over many of the others.- Branche: Automotive
- Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 5.0 /10
Easy to Use but Missed Some Simple Features
Bewertet am 23.6.2020
Overall while sometimes frustrating the tool meets the simple needs for what I require.
Overall while sometimes frustrating the tool meets the simple needs for what I require.
Vorteile
Very easy to use and customize to tell the appropriate story
Nachteile
There are some simple misses, what seems like very simple feature development and items that should be considered as part of an MVP (minimally viable product) should have been deployed by now.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 5.0 /10
Good software, lacks some time planning features
Bewertet am 3.11.2020
It was really good for me to organize our team ideas and tasks. I used it to get an overview, but...
It was really good for me to organize our team ideas and tasks. I used it to get an overview, but my main task was to organize nut just the priority but also make a time planning. The time planning failed for me because the timeline features did not match my expectations. Overall it is a good planning tool for me, but I only used it one time to organize our staff and then I exported it to make time planning in other tools. I would definitely recommend this tool to other product teams when it comes to prioritization and organization, but the time planning features need a little bit more features.
Vorteile
It is easy to use and manage your ideas/tasks. The categorization of ideas and value algorithms can be adjusted very easy, this gives the user maximum flexibility. Prioritization planning works really good.
Nachteile
The timeline usability was bad, setting up lots of tasks/ideas was really pain. What I was missing mostly was the ability to relate ideas/tasks to milestones. You can set milestones in time, but you can not assign ideas to milestones.
Gründe für den Wechsel zu airfocus
Features seemed more straightforward and flexible for me than in other products.- Branche: Einzelhandel
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Fantastic, simple and clear tool to see the wood from the tree's in our complex roadmaps
Bewertet am 24.6.2020
Vorteile
On boarding of an existing list of items is very easy, the custom tags allow you to group features/items so that when deciding on next set of improvements and functions, you can achieve economies of scale. The swim lane style structure really helps us visualise where we are, what we have prioritised, and what we have completed allowing easy to create presentations for stakeholders when communicating roadmaps and progress.
Nachteile
I'm not sure the feature voting function is something we will use, and it would be great to have a MoSCoW feature. The user roles and permissions also need evolving, change history would be extremely handy and a function to allow you to create unique ticket ID's would be fantastic, but these are improvements more then dislikes.
Gründe für den Wechsel zu airfocus
UI, features, license discount and collaboration with the AirFocus team.- Branche: Internet
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Kostenlose Testversion genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Product Roadmap
Bewertet am 22.3.2022
Vorteile
The prioritization features and the priority chart view. Love how the prioritization is calculated automatically, definitely gives you a different view of the importance of your roadmap items; especially when using the priority chart view. Makes it really easy to see what features you should focus on next.
Nachteile
What I liked least, and this is just for the sake of having to list something, is the abundance of templates. There are tons of templates but they are all based on the same functionality with slight settings tweaked. AT first, I found this confusing and overwhelming as I did not understand what the difference was. Until I spent a good amount of time using it then chose what I liked the most from each and made it into my own.
- Branche: Versorgungsunternehmen
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Product Roadmapping with AirFocus
Bewertet am 11.4.2019
Overall we have really taken to AirFocus as a company and are using it across our organization's...
Overall we have really taken to AirFocus as a company and are using it across our organization's functions. The ease of use, nice UI, and ability to rank features is what makes it most impactful for us.
Vorteile
I like how this software is simple to use for Product Roadmapping - my main use case as Chief Product Officer. One feature that really stands out for me with AirFocus is the ability to define a weighting scale and weight your features. The view that shows you most important to least important features is very helpful in making decisions on what to prioritize on your roadmap.
Nachteile
I'd like to see more fine grained user controls (along with more user tracking of who makes what changes on the roadmap). There have been a few instances where other users changed my roadmap (we also use it for business/tech roadmapping) and it wasn't easy to tell what was changed.
Antwort von airfocus
Thanks for the inspiring and helpful review. We're already working on a granular item history/change log. 100% understood that this is needed. All the best.
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Great for managing inputs from multiple stakeholders
Bewertet am 1.9.2022
Excellent
Excellent
Vorteile
Really appreciate how easy it is use for transparent prioritization of features among multiple stakeholders. Eliminates confusion and concerns about what we're going to build next.
Nachteile
Would like a little more flexibility with formatting the columns, but overall, it's quite easy to use
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Great software for roadmap management
Bewertet am 29.3.2022
Of all the solutions for managing the RoadMap Airfocus has been the best and at a very affordable...
Of all the solutions for managing the RoadMap Airfocus has been the best and at a very affordable cost.
Vorteile
- Easy to use
- The prioritization module is excellent
- The visibility I can give to the team and the board of directors
- The customization of the views and fields
Nachteile
- Sometimes it gets slow
I have no other product cons
- Branche: Versorgungsunternehmen
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Align your teams around the roadmap
Bewertet am 23.6.2020
Vorteile
Being able to share links with live views of the roadmap, timeline, task list is great. Being able to score features and functions on different, bespoke criteria, means that only the features that are going to move the needle make their way into development.
Nachteile
Being able to bulk score, i.e. these 10 features all score an 8 would be useful, currently you have to score each on individually.
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Get started quickly!
Bewertet am 23.6.2020
Positive. Our biggest pain point is communicating vision, roadmap, and product releases. Airfocus...
Positive. Our biggest pain point is communicating vision, roadmap, and product releases. Airfocus allows us to do this at a strategic-level while tapping into our team-level kanban boards, where attention meets intention. The product is intuitive and augmented by inline customer support. You really feel there is a dedicated team behind you, and the post-sales support call furthers this sentiment.
Vorteile
The Timeline and Scoring features make prioritization, which most companies/teams can struggle with, easy to do. It's also nice to have bi-direction sync to everyday third-party products (trello/jira).
Nachteile
I'd like to see the pricing model change to allow for unlimited contributors. The value of this product is inclusion. That said, I'm looking forward to the public portal feature (Q3).
- Branche: Freizeit, Reisen & Tourismus
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Only use the timline
Bewertet am 1.7.2020
Vorteile
The timeline view. It is easy and quick to update and share with stakeholders.
We don't use any other functionality of Airfocus.
Nachteile
Pricing, currently we share a single user with all product owners.
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Monatlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 5.0 /10
Not expensive and sleek
Bewertet am 6.10.2019
Vorteile
- Has jira integration!
- Has the bubble charts for drivers (rating system)
- not expensive
Nachteile
- doesn't have open voting for team/customers.
Zuvor genutzte Software
Productboard- Branche: Konsumgüter
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Necessary for all modern product teams
Bewertet am 12.4.2019
Vorteile
As the person who runs product and engineering at our organization, there are requests coming in from every department for features, updates, and new products/pages. Being able to build a prioritization framework that the entire org is bought into that I can share with everyone has been invaluable. The entire team can now see our roadmap and why we're working on certain things. We built a google form to ingest requests, which creates an asana and airfocus task. We then enter their scores for impact, and our scores for effort and other teams can clearly see where their projects fall on the prioritization list. It's made conversations about bandwidth so much easier and made our teams work more transparent.
Nachteile
Currently, there is no way to have multiple frameworks inside a single project. It's also a bit expensive on a per-user basis.
Antwort von airfocus
Thanks for the inspiring feedback. Love the Form/Asana/airfocus workflow.
We're soon gonna launch master roadmaps. This will hopefully help you.
- Branche: Pharmazeutika
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Kostenlose Testversion genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 6.0 /10
Ready-set-go!
Bewertet am 19.5.2020
it's really "ready-set-go" and with learning the possibilities you can give more input and receive...
it's really "ready-set-go" and with learning the possibilities you can give more input and receive more output
you can start small and build it up
very intuitive
Vorteile
Easy to define features and link them to teams and epics
Able to define the values and put a score on it. Even able to change them later on without much effort.
Visualisation of the features on the chart gives you a great overview and information
Timeline is easy to manage without to much needed information
Nachteile
still need to find cons.
Sometimes you have to finetune or rethink some things, but it's not that you have to start from scratch.
- Branche: Unterhaltung
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Great at what it does
Bewertet am 2.7.2020
A simple, yet powerful, tool to use as a roadmap that can be published to stakeholders as needed.
A simple, yet powerful, tool to use as a roadmap that can be published to stakeholders as needed.
Vorteile
The detailed and configurable initiative scoring is exactly what we needed to evaluate future projects. The priority poker tool they have created is also an amazing way to unearth really productive conversations with all of our seniors.
Nachteile
I had a few things, but then they released an update and all of my concerns were addressed. It's like they were listening! I would like to maybe see some deeper integration of OKRs or other ways to communicate and do a basic tracking of progress towards annual objectives.
- Branche: Risikokapital & privates Eigenkapital
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Really good product for remote teams
Bewertet am 23.6.2020
We are using it to manage the development of our internal technology platform. It works really well...
We are using it to manage the development of our internal technology platform. It works really well to create a backlog of feature requests and ideas that we want to implement. We then prioritize them collaboratively and introduce them into our roadmap.
Vorteile
Very useful for remote teams. The collaboration features are very useful.
Very intuitive and easy to set up.
UX/UI is very good.
I really like the timeline view
Nachteile
One feature that is still missing: Public roadmaps with the option to upvote and downvote features
- Branche: Finanzdienstleistungen
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Weitere für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Overall good software
Bewertet am 8.9.2019
Was good to be able to communicate with staff/help via the chat, where I gave feedback on new...
Was good to be able to communicate with staff/help via the chat, where I gave feedback on new features - that was good. Overall the software seems reliable and easy to use. Could do with more robust feature set. But what it does, it does well and simply.
Vorteile
Easy to use and understand. Interface and UI is simple.
Nachteile
Could have more features. Sometimes doesn't quite work as I want/thought it would.
- Branche: Internet
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
review of airfocus
Bewertet am 8.1.2021
Vorteile
It really helps with product strategy in a collaborative/remote setup. Love being able to create roadmap dependencies with drag n drop. Defending decisions and prioritizing your backlog is smooth. Being able to score features and pushing them to Trello is a major bonus.
Nachteile
I'm being picky here, but their iPhone app could improve.
- Branche: Medizinische Geräte
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10
Makes its work
Bewertet am 6.10.2019
Vorteile
Help us to prioritize our feathers
Clear the road map plan
Improve our collaborating skills
Nachteile
Integration to Asana should work better, the overall work plan should be synchronized in two ways
Antwort von airfocus
Hi there,
Thanks for your valuable feedback. Our Asana integration is actually 2-way-sync. Would be great to learn where you experienced problems.
Best, Malte
- Branche: Automotive
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10
Overall, great tool. They've been responsive and helpful.
Bewertet am 18.7.2018
Vorteile
Easy of use. The prioritization tool is awesome. The interface is very intuitive. I really like seeing the roadmap with the score on it.
Nachteile
The chat support is sometimes not very quick to respond. There are a couple features that would make this product even better, like the ability to role multiple items up to a larger item.
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Kostenlose Testversion genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Bedienkomfort
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10
Simple but effective
Bewertet am 11.9.2019
Vorteile
Was easy to setup and build a road map of existing products the team is working on
Nachteile
Missing a few features we would like such as adding tasks to the road map items and creating dependencies
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
Airtable- Branche: Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 6.0 /10
Good product but still need work on it
Bewertet am 16.11.2020
Is simple, and also very powerful to share information compared with other tools as product board...
Is simple, and also very powerful to share information compared with other tools as product board or Asana (really close tools). Very interesting the possibility to prioritize using ICE framework.
Vorteile
The Priorization possibilities, the Asana integration and the Iframes possibilities to let to stakeholder to track.
Nachteile
Manual synchronization. Not Asana Due date synchronization , finished task in Asana are not considered. I think that Asana synchronization in general is a big advantage but you should still work on it to obtain maximum information from Asana tasks.
- Branche: Gesundheit, Wellness & Fitness
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Gesamtbewertung
- Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
- Bedienkomfort
- Kundenbetreuung
- Weiterempfehlungsquote 7.0 /10
Great tool for Product Managers
Bewertet am 23.6.2020
Vorteile
Ability to tie product initiatives back to overall product timelines.
Nachteile
Price could be lower, and also better integration with Jira and other tools