GitLab Erfahrungen

leicht bedienbares Benutzerinterface, hervorragende mobile Nutzbarkeit

Issues sind nicht in mehrere Repositories trackbar, Server sind weniger stabil als bei GitHub

Kostenlos, einfach, Versionskontrolle möglich, Teams ebenso

Es ist schwer Gitlab von der Konkurrenz abzugrenzen, zb Github. Gefühlt bietet Github sogar mehr Funktionen…

Die Einfachheit das Preisleistungs Verhältnis .

Ich finde das dass Programm ein bisschen unübersichtlich ist.

Wir nutzen GitLab täglich im Scrum Projekt für unsere commits und Versionierung. Diese Funktionen sind super ausgebaut und erfüllen Ihren Zweck selbst in einem Team von 10 Leuten gibt es selten Probleme.

Integration in unsere tägliche Arbeitsprozesse war kompliziert

It’s good for managing the development assets in IT. Easier to understand the conflicts for new starters also.

It’s good to have a user interface to understand any conflicts, issues etc., while using

When it comes to versioning and centralized development there's no better than Gitlab

So far Gitlab has conveniently filled the purpose it was supposed to do. So not a thing that I don't like in Gitlab

Readme is include in the template of repository.

Uploading code to repository is tricky when 2-factor authentication is enabled.

Straightforward alternative to the Github experience. Good layout. Does not get in the way. Tracks what needs tracking.

Purely that it's a different experience from Github, which takes some getting used to.

This is a good solution for those who want an SCM that covers the entire life of software development, including task management.

Some aspects should be improved, such as task management or static code analysis.

It has all the necessary features for revision control for projects with a few people on it.

There is not a great way to teach this to people who are coming in from a CAD system like Catia, Solidworks, or Creo. There is not a great way to teach this to PCB designers that are coming from KiCAD or Altium. It would be great to have a GUI for those that aren't using a traditional codebase.

Easy to use; easy to setup, do all I need

Needs a bit of doc reading to set-up, but it's understandable

I love how simple it is to share and collaborate projects.

There is a relatively steep learning curve. Despite given instructions, outside resources are required to fully utilize GitLab.

Its ability to facilitate easy collaboration on projects through robust version control

Gitlab does frequent interface changes and feature updates

It offers an all-in-one platform that includes version control, issue tracking, continuous integration, and more.
It excels at managing Git repositories, allowing for easy branching, merging, and version control.
It has robust access control features, allowing administrators to manage user roles, permissions, and project visibility.

It is resource-intensive, especially for larger projects or organizations.
It is hard to initially learn the tools and technologies.
The UI/UX is less tempting.

I am fan of Gitlab CI, it's highly robust and highly reliable.

No public repository options like Github

The GitLab CI feature made deployments a lot quicker and simpler.

It didn't integrate natively with AWS's CodePipeline service a couple of years ago.

Free plan.
Collaboration.
Ease of setup.

Have limits in free plan.
No much community support like Github.

The best GitLab has are the pipelines. They can be used for integration, for unit tests, for external scanners and, what is most important for me, security scans.

The only thing I can say I don't like about GitLab is the project management approach. I don't really find the issue and incidences schemas complete and I would like them to have more options.

Task management is quite nice. Allocation of incidents is working well.

Quite lazy responses from the system and a lot of mess in the interface organization. Low reporting system.