BrowserStack Erfahrungen

I love the speed of opening a test platform, switching to others, and how easy it is to use it and interact with text fields. I have noticed stability improvements over the years that I love.

It can't perfectly replicate the experience of having a mobile device in my hands, so that's the main shortcoming.

BrowserStack has strong after sales support and continuously evolving as per trends and bringing the features needed for QA community.

They can improve on boot time for Real Mobile devices for enhanced customer experience and Network Logs analyser could be better as compared to other product offerings.

UI is very initiative, and ux us very sumple

performance especcialy on videos and controls buttons

Test Management
Low Code Automation
Cross Browser testing
Its very easy to use and we can get help anytime from Support team on any queries

We can still improve upon statuses mentioned in Test Management

Reliable platform and using real devices

Offshore servers causing the problem since you don't know on which server you will be executing the test. Lack of customer support

ease of use, amount of region and devices, security

would like to see advancements in the ADA identification space. I believe we tested your tool a few years ago yet imagine it has advanced. Will reach out to our customer success mgr to get a refresh.

lates devices, quick testing easy availability.
Multi browser

sometime sow response(other than network issue)

I find the BrowserStack UI to be quite intuitive and pleasing to th eeye.

The documentation can be a bit difficult to navigate at times.

I have been utilizing Browserstack for the past four years and have been consistently impressed with the comprehensive suite of modules it offers. The Live module, in particular, has proven to be an invaluable asset, enabling me to effectively address my clients' needs. Furthermore, the robust security measures implemented by Browserstack instill confidence in my clients, ensuring the utmost privacy and protection of sensitive data.

I have not yet identified any vulnerabilities yet.

Browserstack make life of QA easier, compatibility testing was never easy but with browserstack we can get results in few minutes after deployment which results in faster deployment cycles. Another thing about browserstack is there customer support they schedule a call every two weeks with our team to know the challenges which we are facing.

Nothing as per se, they could improve automation capabilities

Working as a developer at a large retailer, I use Browserstack almost daily to test our website changes (internal and external) across a wide range of devices. Browserstack is particularly useful compared to competitors because it has the widest range of actual devices (physical, not emulators), including many older devices.

Dev tools occasionally act strangely on iOS devices, cutting off elements in the Elements panel for example.

I found BrowserStack incredibly beneficial due to its easy access to a wide range of devices for both Android and iOS platforms. As a developer, having seamless access to multiple devices directly from my browser significantly streamlines my testing process. This accessibility ensures that I can efficiently test and debug applications across various devices without the need for physical hardware, saving both time and resources. BrowserStack's intuitive interface and extensive device coverage make it an indispensable tool in my development toolkit.

One of the drawbacks I experienced with BrowserStack is the need to repeatedly log in to the app stores, particularly when a session expires. This can be somewhat inconvenient, especially during longer testing sessions where frequent logins interrupt the workflow. It would be more efficient if there was an option to maintain these credentials securely over multiple sessions or at least extend the session duration to reduce the number of logins required. Despite this, the overall benefits of the platform still outweigh this minor inconvenience.

1. We can able to enable the Developer tools to observe the failures in network calls.
For example: I am launching the web URL in Safari/Chrome Browser and for some reason, if it is getting failed means there I can able to enable the Developer tools and able to verify the failure calls.

2. We can able to do local testing by installing BrowserStackLocal.msi. There we can test our web applications in local also. I personally love this feature.

3. We can also do Accessibility testing. I have did this and it is working as expected.

4. We can able to do Selenium automation for browser validations. It gives confident to both QA and Dev about the application stability and also we can ensure that all functionalities are working fine as we do testing in REAL devices.

1. Sometimes we can slowness and rendering while we do testing.
2. I found some some difficulties in setting up the local setup while testing.

It provides very accurate results as compared to real devices and is usable.

No cons felt till the date and highly recommended to everyone.

The Test Runs are well done, organized and contains a lot of good data available to track the progress of the run.

There are some things that could be improved on Test Management, like a button for copying a test case to the same folder and the possibility to drag and drop folders to reorganize the structure. There is also a few bugs, like when you click on edit folder name and select the current name using the cursor and the pop up window closes.

What I like is to be able to realize my QA testing in mutiple devices and different versions etc without having a hard time to get physical devices to do it, so Browserstack helps me a lot!

Input lag sometimes but this is common when it comes to streaming.

Usability for testing specific use cases on specific virtual devices

The network manage for accesing protected elements could be better