--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu Assembla mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche Assembla mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Assembla Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [PLM-Software](/directory/329/product-lifecycle-management/software) > [Assembla](/software/9949/assembla) # Assembla Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/9949/assembla Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/9949/assembla?page=2) > SVN ist weiterhin das bevorzugte Repository bei Software-Teams, die Projekte mit großen Datenmengen verwalten. Seit mehr als 10 Jahren vertrauen Unternehmen auf der ganzen Welt Assembla, um ihre SVN-Repositories in einer sicheren, leistungsstarken Cloud-Umgebung zu hosten. Verwalte ein Projekt-orientiertes Unternehmen \* Vereinheitliche ein Kernteam, Auftragnehmer und Kunden \* Mache einen guten Eindruck, mit Branding und Kunden-Berechtigungen \* Berichte über ein Portfolio von Projekten \* Verfolge Zeitschätzungen und Ausgaben \* Beschleunige Dein Team mit einem Wiki, einer Nachrichtentafel, gemeinsam genutzten Dateien und anderen klassischen Zusammenarbeits-Tools. Assembla führt sie zu einer Aktivität zusammen und fügt weitere spezialisierte Tools hinzu. > > Bewertung: **4.2/5** von 103 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.2/5** | 103 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 70% | (7/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: IDERA - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 19,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 208 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung - Agile Methodiken - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anpassbare Felder - Audit Trail - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgaben-Tagging - Aufgabenmanagement - Aufgabenmanagement - Aufgabenplanung - Authentifizierung - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Codeprüfung - Compliance Management - Dokumentenmanagement - Einsatz-Management - Filesharing ## Integrationen (14 insgesamt) - Dropbox Business - Filestack - GitHub - Gmail - Google Docs - Google Drive - Jira - Meta for Business - OneDrive - Slack - TestRail - Travis CI - Trello - Zapier ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [PLM-Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/329/product-lifecycle-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [PLM-Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/329/product-lifecycle-management/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/332/project-management/software) - [Aufgabenmanagement Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/570/task-management/software) - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1477/source-code-management/software) - [Programmiersoftware](https://www.getapp.de/directory/370/application-development/software) ## Alternativen 1. [GitHub](https://www.getapp.de/software/90537/github) — 4.8/5 (6155 reviews) 2. [GitLab](https://www.getapp.de/software/112635/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1215 reviews) 3. [Bitbucket](https://www.getapp.de/software/91554/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1343 reviews) 4. [Notepad++](https://www.getapp.de/software/2035555/notepad) — 4.7/5 (2001 reviews) 5. [Airtable](https://www.getapp.de/software/106031/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2222 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Asseembla" — 5.0/5 > **Muhammad Adil** | *7. August 2021* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Very good software to task management and cloud based SVN control which you can manage any corner of world. You can easily create and manage tickets and keep time track. Software or code management is easy and really benefits among the developers and teams. > > **Nachteile**: Bit expensive for small teams. Some times while opening ticket the page went blank before showing anything. > > One of the best tool in industry to managing, distribution, launching and sharing agile projects, websites and apps. It has a great reporting tool. ----- ### "When GitHub issues just don't work" — 4.0/5 > **Jared** | *3. Februar 2021* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Ticketing is critical to our process for managing software project. Assembla has a great list view that allow us to have custom fields for each project. This allows us to create views into projects that sort and filter tickets by criteria meaningful to our stakeholders. Additionally tickets have good support for relationships and some hierarchy. This is in contrast to GitHub or GitLab issues, which offer limited support for sorting and filtering and require a tedious management of tags for everything not provided by default (which isn't much) A project with any serious complexity should consider using Assembla for ticket management. > > **Nachteile**: The wiki syntax for tickets is non-standard and clunky. Developers use Markdown for every other tool that requires them to write prose. The lack of support for Markdown seems like a fairly large oversight. This becomes especially egregious when developers refuse to learn yet another syntax and just paste markdown into tickets despite the lack of support. Who can blame them. A more minor point is that the various features lack a coherent design language and level of quality. The UI/UX can be fairly different between modules, almost like they were written by different teams or at different eras of web development history. Also the level of quality varies wildly. You will find that some modules are rife with bugs and interface quirks while others operate bug free using modern interface idioms. Overall this makes the product seem lower quality than something more polished like GitHub, despite having a solid core of features needed for real project management. > > Overall our experience with Assembla has been positive and it is indispensable to our workflow. While it would be possible to replace it with another product, it would not be without the pain of changing how we work to accommodate the tool. ----- ### "Hasn't kept pace with competitors" — 3.0/5 > **Paul** | *8. Februar 2021* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: To be honest, there's nothing I really like about the product. It's ok but there's certainly no standout likeable feature. > > **Nachteile**: A few years ago I asked for Markdown to be added as a text format option to match Github and other development platforms, I'm still waiting. The ticket preview on click has made working with the tool harder because I can no longer middle click to open multiple tickets. Right click and open in a new tab is awful because the tab takes over the window so to open multiple I need to right click, open in new tab, switch back to the previous tab, rinse and repeat. Shift click and control click don't work either. The whole feature seems like a face-palm. Integrations significantly lacking compared to competitors ----- ### "Seamless integration" — 5.0/5 > **prasanth** | *14. Mai 2024* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Seamless integration. Creating keys and access to repo is easier. > > **Nachteile**: need better breadcrumbs to move around. ----- ### "Kanban driven but needs improvements" — 4.0/5 > **Andrzej** | *3. Februar 2021* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Kanban board is one of the most advanced features from the market, it's quite clear and nicely designed. Sometimes drag n drop were rigged but lately i think it got fixed. Github integration should be in price not in higher tier as it's quite used. Wiki pages could be extendend. > > **Nachteile**: I don't like that there is no emergency line as it should be in Kanban theory. I can't customise priorities Whole board view is horizontal driven i can't do a tree structure and see it from top down. Which is difficult if we need to monitor and organize more then 1 milestone or topics on one board. I can't have a view with 3-4 boards on its , we have 3 or 4 boards per project in a team, and as a team we should have a view which merges all 3-4 boards and allows to plan and organize tasks with the 4 different projects. Excel / google sheets export could be nice - sometimes for overall planning the cards are too heavy and there is too much colors, excel is quite tabular, and with my client we are often using excel beacuse its better for fast and simple view - this could be major enhancemnt to prepare simple view, which would give overall ticket status in form of table with columns ----- Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/9949/assembla?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/9949/assembla) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten