--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu OnBoard mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche OnBoard mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: OnBoard Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Online-Meeting Software](/directory/101/online-meetings/software) > [OnBoard](/software/105973/onboard-board-portal) # OnBoard Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/105973/onboard-board-portal Seite: 1 / 43\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/105973/onboard-board-portal?page=2) > OnBoard ist eine Software zur Verwaltung von virtuellen Vorstandssitzungen und Meetings der Unternehmensführung, die umfassend und sicher ist. Das Tool bietet deinem Team eine komplette Suite von Meeting-Tools, um agile, intelligente Entscheidungen zu treffen. Sei mit OnBoard bereit für Remote-Meetings. Leite sie sicher von überall und von jedem Gerät aus. Mit kostenloser Testversion. > > Bewertung: **4.7/5** von 1055 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.7/5** | 1055 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: OnBoard - **Region**: Indianapolis, USA ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Irland, Kanada, Neuseeland, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - AI Copilot - AI Summarization - API - Absolventen-Management - Agenda verwalten - Aktivitäts-/Newsfeeds - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anmerkungen - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Formulare - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Anwesenheitsmanagement - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenliste - Aufgabenmanagement ## Integrationen (11 insgesamt) - Google Authenticator - Google Drive - Microsoft 365 - Microsoft Entra ID - Microsoft Exchange - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft Teams - Okta - OneLogin - Zoom Workplace - iCloud ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Online-Meeting Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/101/online-meetings/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Online-Meeting Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/101/online-meetings/software) - [Portal-Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/464/portal/software) - [Meeting Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/881/meeting/software) - [Collaboration Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/335/web-collaboration/software) - [Board-Management-Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/831/board-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Diligent Boards](https://www.getapp.de/software/102917/diligent-boards) — 4.7/5 (339 reviews) 2. [BoardPro](https://www.getapp.de/software/110411/boardpro) — 4.8/5 (822 reviews) 3. [Wrike](https://www.getapp.de/software/9964/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2887 reviews) 4. [BoardEffect](https://www.getapp.de/software/107725/boardeffect) — 4.4/5 (127 reviews) 5. [Boardable](https://www.getapp.de/software/110023/boardable) — 4.7/5 (128 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "SO glad we made the switch\!" — 4.0/5 > **Melinda (Mel)** | *13. Februar 2020* | Hochschulbildung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: OnBoard is user-friendly and quite intuitive; it has been a life-saver when making last-minute changes to meeting agendas and materials; it's compatible with both Apple and Android devices; and going paperless has saved us a significant amount of time and money. > > **Nachteile**: 1. Honestly, it's a bit on the pricey side. 2. When an agenda item (title, time, position on agenda, presenter, supporting document, etc.) changes, the software rebuilds the entire board book and any user's annotations/notes disappear - even if their annotations were made to a section that wasn't changed. It would be great if there was a way to retain an individual user's notes/annotations. 3. In the Analytics section, instead of just an Aggregate Count of Book Views by Role and an Aggregate Count of Meeting Views by Role, I would LOVE to be able to see exactly who has viewed board books and meetings so we can track who is engaged on the portal and reach out to those who are not and see if they need additional training or assistance navigating the portal. > > Our experience with OnBoard has been excellent. From the sales reps. to the account managers to our Implementation Manager - everyone has been very responsive and helpful. ----- ### "Excellent combination of value and options" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *1. Juli 2021* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: OnBoard is easy to administer and easy to use. It allows me to configure the different areas as I need to and grant granular permissions. It is a great value for the non-profit business that needs to be agile with reliable access to all the items board members could need. > > **Nachteile**: The only item I wish could be better is the integration with Zoom. The feature works fine but when board members or hosts use the Zoom link inside OnBoard they lose some functionality. To get around this I have taken to posting the Zoom link for the meeting in its title and ask the board members to copy and paste the link into their browser. If they didn't want full use of all Zoom options they are welcome to use the link provided inside the portal. > > OnBoard has streamlined my work as the Board Admin and has allowed board members access to all files they should have access to whenever they need it. Not all board members are quick to adopt the new system and this is causing a lag in the full usage for our company but this is a people issue, not a tech issue. The tech is very easy and fairly intuitive. ----- ### "This Software is Now in the Cash Flow Phase" — 3.0/5 > **Brandon** | *8. März 2024* | Bankwesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The portion of the software focused on meeting orchestration is good. The feature functionality around scheduling meetings, building agendas, and aggregating attachments works well (although this doesn't carry through actually running a meeting). > > **Nachteile**: During meetings, the meeting book does not automatically size to the window. At all. As users scroll through the meeting, it is very distracting to continually zoom/unzoom/scroll right/scroll down to fit information to the screen. This functionality is standard in PDF readers. Online discussions are not threaded. You may only have ONE long-running discussion with each distinct set of people. It makes the feature useless for all but the most mundane of communications. The software does not support read-only audit users. Most organizations, both for-profit and not-for-profit, need to provide access to state examiners, federal examiners, or financial auditors. Despite asking for this functionality for years, the only response is that we may buy more licenses to support temporary users, which would require manually back-allocating user permissions to all meetings and files. > > We are so disappointed with the ongoing lack of support. We have been asking for basic feature additions for years, and have even offered to pay for additional development (we are a $400M company). The software platform is clearly past the investment phase, and we regret the past few years of investment from a time and financial perspective. ----- ### "Great product and good value" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *13. Dezember 2019* | Forschung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Simple to use from both an administrators and users perspective. Switch from paper packs to online packs was much simpler than we anticipated. OnBoard listen to recommendations and suggestions from clients and implement them where possible - in the 12 months or so we've been using the product, I've seen a few upgrades which were a direct response to a request from clients. They are regularly updating and innovating to improve the product, which is great to see. > > **Nachteile**: Operates a little differently to other well known board pack software, so users familiar with other types may need more guidance to get used to OnBoard. Notifications that uploads have been unsuccessful are a little too subtle - meaning that you can miss it if you are working quickly (as we so often are during board pack creation). > > I have had a very positive experience with OnBoard, from the initial sales conversations right through to the feedback sessions as a client. Customer Service has been very good and the product has worked very well for us. It has greatly reduced the time spent producing paper packs and been very useful in meetings. ----- ### "Easy interface" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *10. März 2020* | Hochschulbildung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The OnBoard portal is easy for our board members to use with fewer clicks to get the information they need for their meeting. The view is the same from different devices which makes it easier for them to move between laptop and phone views. Having access to AGB resources is invaluable. > > **Nachteile**: The feature I would like to see improved the most is the downloaded version of the agenda to Word from the agenda created on the site. It takes a lot of formatting changes to make it look good. The version that downloads is very difficult to read. We have tried uploading our own agenda, but then we lose the nice online version when we pull up the meeting book. > > Most functionalities in OnBoard are much easier to use, both as an administrator and as a user. Customer service response has been good, but there are some features that they haven't been able to improve upon (ie agenda). ----- Seite: 1 / 43\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/105973/onboard-board-portal?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/105973/onboard-board-portal) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten