--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu Submittable mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche Submittable mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Submittable Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](/directory/669/public-sector/software) > [Submittable](/software/107673/submittable) # Submittable Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/107673/submittable Seite: 1 / 17\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/107673/submittable?page=2) > Submittable ist eine Online-Plattform für das Einreichungsmanagement, die vereinfacht, wie Unternehmen und Institutionen von einem zentralen Ort aus Bewerber\*innen überprüfen und annehmen oder ablehnen können. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 398 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 398 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Submittable - **Region**: Missoula, USA - **Gegründet**: 2010 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Irland, Kanada, Neuseeland, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - ACH Zahlungsabwicklung - API - Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung - Ad-hoc-Berichterstattung - Administrative Berichterstattung - Adressen-Validierung - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anforderungsmanagement - Angebot in sozialen Medien - Angebotsmanagement - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Formulare - Anpassbare Fragen - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Anwendungsmanagement - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement ## Integrationen (21 insgesamt) - ActiveCampaign - Airtable - Bloomerang - Dynamics 365 - Gmail - Google Drive - Google Sheets - Invoice Ninja - Jira - Mailchimp - Mailjet - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Notion - Salesforce Platform ... und 6 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](https://www.getapp.de/directory/669/public-sector/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Software für öffentliche Verwaltung](https://www.getapp.de/directory/669/public-sector/software) - [Fundraising-Software (Spendensoftware)](https://www.getapp.de/directory/169/fundraising/software) - [Spendenverwaltung Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/167/donation-management/software) - [Software für die Identitätsprüfung](https://www.getapp.de/directory/3854/identity-verification/software) - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/170/grant-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Good Grants](https://www.getapp.de/software/160227/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Bitrix24](https://www.getapp.de/software/90602/bitrix24) — 4.2/5 (991 reviews) 3. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.getapp.de/software/105791/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (95 reviews) 4. [Sage Intacct](https://www.getapp.de/software/10360/intacct) — 4.3/5 (684 reviews) 5. [Little Green Light](https://www.getapp.de/software/90417/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (316 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "The Best Decision for our Grant Management" — 5.0/5 > **Orsella** | *28. August 2023* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The customer service is unmatched. From billing to IT, messages are returned on the same day. For me, that is better than the program itself. I never speak to a BOT or an AI rep. I can actually still speak/email with a human and that makes me stay with Wizehive. > > **Nachteile**: I haven't run into any issues using Wizehive. > > With Wizehive, the grant management process at our foundation has changed for the better drastically. To have 100's of grant applications in one place and be able to manage archived and current applications with ease has cut my work by more than half. ----- ### "New Impressed User" — 5.0/5 > **Savannah** | *23. Juli 2024* | Bau | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: So far, our Implementation Manager has helped us solve all of the problem we have encountered and has taken our feedback seriously and passed it to the Dev team. Everyone is responsive and understanding and we feel like they really tried their best to make the product what we needed it to be to fit our program\! > > **Nachteile**: There is a lot of room for improvements and development, so we look forward to seeing that progress as we start our journey with WizeHive\! ----- ### "Submittable is user-friendly, but only for applicants." — 2.0/5 > **Sydney** | *22. September 2022* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The product is easy for applicants to use, with simple forms and clear application guidelines. Generally, we have had many applicants have no issues while applying, which is definitely a positive about the platform. > > **Nachteile**: For administrative staff who work grant programs on the back-end, features such as advanced reporting are sorely lacking. It's difficult to build these reports and pull through the data you need. Additionally, there are many small issues that Submittable merely provides "work-arounds" for, rather than solving problems. For example - tables that are put directly into an application form export as a separate file, and then would need to be merged in order to package applications. While the platform might make the process of applying smooth for applicants, there seem to always be headaches for our staff when processing applications afterwards. ----- ### "Positive Experience with WizeHive - Excellent training, support, and resources" — 5.0/5 > **Renee Sanders** | *17. Juni 2024* | Umweltdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: WizeHive has proven to be a wonderful solution for our program. We are currently running a large multi-year grant funding competition and needed a system that could meet our needs for proposal collection, application review, reporting, and other elements of grant management. WizeHive has been a perfect fit. The training experience with \[sensitive content hidden\] was excellent. \[sensitive content hidden\] always answered questions thoroughly and quickly solved problems as we worked together to create our first fully-functioning application portal. During our application acceptance period, no applicants reported having any issues with the WizeHive system. Everything worked so smoothly\! Reviewers have also had a smooth experience while reviewing applications. The support staff is also quick to response with helpful resources. > > **Nachteile**: It would be nice if we could have the capacity to allow multiple files to be uploaded in one question in an application where relevant. > > Working with WizeHive has been a quality experience that has made grant and program management much easier for our team. We are thrilled to be working together over the next few years on our current program and look forward to looking for other efforts we could incorporate WizeHive into in the future. Administrators, applicants, and reviewers all report positive experiences with using WizeHive. ----- ### "Wize Way to Manage: A Grant Management Game Changer" — 5.0/5 > **Kristen** | *5. Juni 2024* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I appreciate most was the intuitive dashboard menu, which will allow our organization to effortlessly track and manage our grants. The interface for admin staff, external reviewer, and grantees is easy to navigate. The robust reporting features offer valuable insights, enabling us to make data-driven decisions and optimize our grant management process. The customizable workflows have allowed us to tailor the system to our unique needs, which we believe will result in enhanced efficiency. Additionally, I am impressed by the exceptional customer support provided by the WizeHive team, who are always responsive and helpful as I've needed assistance during the onboarding process. > > **Nachteile**: While I'm extremely pleased with our WizeHive subscription, we encountered some drawbacks during the onboarding process. Specifically, I discovered a few features mentioned in our initial sales call were not part of our subscription package and would require an additional fee, which was prohibitively expensive for our small organization. Also, some key functionalities that tipped the scales for us in favor of WizeHive over other grant management systems are not yet available but are expected to be added in future updates. > > Overall, I'm delighted with WizeHive and would highly recommend the NextZen platform to anyone seeking a reliable, user-friendly, and comprehensive grant management solution. By investing in this technology, we will elevate the experience for all stakeholders within our organization and ensure that our processes and tools reflect our grantee partnership objectives. ----- Seite: 1 / 17\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/107673/submittable?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/107673/submittable) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten