--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu TestMu AI mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche TestMu AI mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: TestMu AI Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Automated Testing Tools](/directory/389/testing/software) > [TestMu AI](/software/111387/lambdatest) # TestMu AI Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/111387/lambdatest Seite: 1 / 23\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/111387/lambdatest?page=2) > Teste deine öffentlichen oder lokal gehosteten Webanwendungen über mehr als 2.000 verschiedene Browser, OS, Lösungen und Geräte nahtlos mit LambDatest. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 547 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 547 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: LambdaTest - **Region**: San Francisco, USA - **Gegründet**: 2017 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 19,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Aruba, Australien, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgien, Belize, Bermuda, Britische Jungferninseln, Bulgarien, Costa Rica, Deutschland, Dominica, Dominikanische Republik, Dänemark, El Salvador, Finnland, Frankreich und 43 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Agile Methodiken - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anforderungsbasiertes Testen - Anforderungsmanagement - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Aufgabenmanagement - Aufgabenplanung - Beurteilung-Management - Bug-/Problemerfassung - Cross-Browser-Tests - Datenvisualisierung - Debuggen - Fehlerverfolgung - Konfigurierbarer Workflow ## Integrationen (15 insgesamt) - Asana - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Hive - Jira - MantisBT - Microsoft Visual Studio - Paymo - Slack - Teamwork.com - Trello - WordPress - monday.com AI Work Platform ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support ## Category - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/389/testing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/389/testing/software) - [Bugtracker](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1299/performance-testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.getapp.de/software/170655/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (775 reviews) 2. [ACCELQ](https://www.getapp.de/software/111257/accelq) — 4.9/5 (144 reviews) 3. [Centercode](https://www.getapp.de/software/119099/centercode) — 4.2/5 (77 reviews) 4. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.de/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 5. [aqua](https://www.getapp.de/software/115903/aqua-alm) — 4.7/5 (28 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Strong Automation Support" — 5.0/5 > **Abu** | *16. Dezember 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I liked most about LambdaTest is its wide range of real browsers and devices combined with fast, reliable performance. The setup is simple, parallel testing saves significant time, and the debugging tools (logs, screenshots, videos) make issue analysis easy. The dashboard is clean, and overall it integrates well with modern test frameworks. > > **Nachteile**: Occasionally, some browsers or devices can be a bit slow to start during peak times. The UI, while feature-rich, can feel slightly overwhelming for new users, and advanced features sometimes require time to fully understand. Pricing can also become higher as parallel usage increases. > > Overall, my experience with LambdaTest has been very positive. It provides a reliable and scalable platform for cross-browser testing with excellent support for modern automation frameworks. The performance is generally stable, parallel testing improves productivity, and the debugging tools make troubleshooting efficient. While there is a small learning curve for advanced features, it’s a powerful tool that fits well into CI/CD workflows. ----- ### "A Reliable and Feature-Rich Platform for Cross-Browser Testing" — 4.0/5 > **Anonymer Nutzer** | *19. Juni 2025* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: LambdaTest has excellent cross-browser testing with good support for browsers and devices along with easy integrations. A few instances of performance hiccups and pricing problems stop this from a flawless 5 stars but otherwise make for a sound and operational platform. > > **Nachteile**: What I liked most about LambdaTest is its wide range of real browsers and devices, which ensures thorough compatibility testing. The platform is easy to use, and setting up live and automated tests is simple. I also appreciate its strong integration support with tools like GitHub, Jira, Slack, and CI/CD pipelines. Visual regression testing and smart UI testing features are also incredibly helpful for frontend teams. > > Occasionally, sessions take time to load, especially when accessing older browsers or emulated mobile devices. The automated screenshot tool sometimes has rendering inconsistencies, and network throttling settings could offer more flexibility. Also, for startups or small teams, the pricing might feel high unless all advanced features are regularly used. ----- ### "Fake Devices, Real problems with Security Bugs" — 1.0/5 > **Vince** | *28. Oktober 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The UI looks modern but Backend is not stable - pretty interface hiding a broken backend. Lambdatest Security bugs are another nightmare I think this is the reason G2 has recently banned them. > > **Nachteile**: Requested iPhone 14 Pro for testing, got an emulator instead. No warning, no notification. Discovered only when device-specific features failed. This happens 70% of the time. > > Testing our mobile banking app's biometric features. Emulators can't test FaceID or TouchID, making our security testing impossible. ----- ### "No brainer compared to BrowserStack" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *17. Februar 2025* | Professionelles Training & Coaching | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Improvements come thick and fast. The support is incredible. It just works :) > > **Nachteile**: No real issues at all. Would always like things to be cheaper but can't complain as it's competitive. > > Onboarding are great. Sales team aren't annoying like BrowserStack. Would recommend to anyone. ----- ### "Must have for front end website testing" — 5.0/5 > **Lauren** | *28. Januar 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Being able to test sites in all browsers straight from my own browser. I no longer need to have lots of different test devices and computers. Being able to generate screenshots to provide to clients of various breakpoints is also a great feature. The chrome extension for accessibility testing is great it's more useful than some of the other tools I have tried as it's pick up on more and you can inspect the page to see exactly what element it is flagging, with the A rating. There have also been other useful features I have needed in the past like local testing and tunnelling that I have been able to do with other platforms. The screen recording feature for sending to clients or agencies. > > **Nachteile**: Not found anything I don't like yet, they keep adding useful features. > > I've been using them for a few years now as a professional front end developer and have also recommended them to other agencies. I've only used support once but they were very helpful so my overall experience has been very positive. ----- Seite: 1 / 23\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/111387/lambdatest?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/111387/lambdatest) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten