--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu Grant Lifecycle Manager mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche Grant Lifecycle Manager mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Grant Lifecycle Manager Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](/directory/170/grant-management/software) > [Grant Lifecycle Manager](/software/113013/foundant-for-grantmakers) # Grant Lifecycle Manager Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/113013/foundant-for-grantmakers Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/113013/foundant-for-grantmakers?page=2) > Foundant for Grantmakers ist ein Managementsystem für den Lebenszyklus von Zuschüssen, das eine Vielzahl von Geldgeberorganisationen bedient, die einen nutzerkonfigurierbaren Workflow anbieten. > > Bewertung: **4.9/5** von 51 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.9/5** | 51 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Foundant Technologies - **Region**: Bozeman, USA - **Gegründet**: 2006 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 9.900,00 $ - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Kanada, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - API - Administrative Berichterstattung - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Formulare - Anpassbare Fragen - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Audit Trail - Auswirkungsmanagement - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Bewerber-Tracking - Budgetierung/Prognosen - Compliance Management - Daten-Import / -Export - Dokumentenmanagement - Dokumentenprüfung - Elektronische Einreichung - Email Reminders - Erinnerungen ## Integrationen (1 insgesamt) - Microsoft Word ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Fördermittelverwaltung Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/170/grant-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Optimy](https://www.getapp.de/software/110899/optimy) — 4.6/5 (42 reviews) 2. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.getapp.de/software/105791/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (94 reviews) 3. [Submittable](https://www.getapp.de/software/107673/submittable) — 4.8/5 (398 reviews) 4. [Sage Intacct](https://www.getapp.de/software/10360/intacct) — 4.3/5 (608 reviews) 5. [Little Green Light](https://www.getapp.de/software/90417/little-green-light) — 4.8/5 (316 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "User Friendly and Intuitive Software" — 5.0/5 > **Amy** | *14. Februar 2022* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The ability to customize applications, evaluations, and follow up reports is great. Most of our grant awards are not a One Size Fits All. > > **Nachteile**: As a data nerd, the reporting feature is not as strong as I wish it to be. The ability to design reports is limited. > > I chose this software 6 years ago over several others that we reviewed. It is perfect for our foundation size and the staff and support team are awesome. The support response time is very fast and if needed, I can get a live body on the phone which was not available from our previous software provider. ----- ### "Perfect for us" — 5.0/5 > **Amie** | *4. Oktober 2023* | Philanthropie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Great customer service, support, and education. User-friendly and intuitive. Has all the tools I need. > > **Nachteile**: Nonprofit agency users can only be listed once in the software due to the fact that each user is allowed only one email address/login. Some of our users work for multiple organizations and need more than one login. > > Excellent. ----- ### "Solid Way for Grant Management" — 4.0/5 > **Clarice** | *9. Juni 2021* | Non-Profit-Organisation Management | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Affordable way to keep information and can keep the history in the cloud Multiple users can use the system Great support from GLM and the community > > **Nachteile**: No CRM to manage contacts No data dashboard It is difficult to open many applications at once - sort of slows down the process > > This has helped us tremendously with grants and grant applications. We wouldnt be able to keep track of everything without it. ----- ### "Foundant has made grant management so easy" — 5.0/5 > **Jennifer** | *3. März 2021* | Einzel- & Familiendienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I love the fact that you can copy a process. This saves so much time - there is no need for re-creating. The somewhat new feature of the option of chatting is fabulous\! Again, a time saver. It allows me to multi-task. The system is user friendly. > > **Nachteile**: I would say the only piece that I cannot give the most accolades to would be the reporting. It seems to be a little clunky or it could just be the user, me. I was a little disappointed to learn that there is not a good fit for all of the roles that we need to assign to our staff members that are involved in an RFP process. Specifically, we have a someone who needs to create and edit reports but I did not want to give him full admin rights, which is what I ended up doing. Something in between would be nice. We have not utilized integration with other apps so far, but if possible, it would be nice to have the following directly connected: https://apps.irs.gov/app/eos/ and https://www.fdacs.gov/. Also, it would be nice if we could have the ability to create 3 evaluation forms since a lot of our RFPs involve a 3rd evaluation phase. > > Our overall experience has been a positive one. Both Applicants and Reviewers seem to have no issues with the system. ----- ### "Foundant GLM Review" — 5.0/5 > **Dayna** | *26. Februar 2021* | Philanthropie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: This software is very user friendly. We surveyed our grantees after implementing GLM and received all positive reviews. > > **Nachteile**: Reporting and Data Sets continue to be challenging. It makes sense when I'm at training classes but when I sit down to create a report the confusion sets in. Even though reporting is challenging I still prefer Foundant GLM over any other software product out there\! > > I have been EXTREMELY pleased with our overall GLM experience. The support Foundant offers is beyond amazing. ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/113013/foundant-for-grantmakers?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/113013/foundant-for-grantmakers) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten