TrialKit

4,6 (33)
Eine Bewertung schreiben
SaaS-Tool zur Erfassung klinischer Daten

Über TrialKit

Clinical Studio ist ein cloudbasiertes System zur elektronischen Datenerfassung (EDC) für CROs, Sponsoren, akademische Institutionen und einzelne Forscher, mit dem Nutzer den Studienaufbau, die Datenerfassung und das Management der klinischen Forschung optimieren können. Die speziell entwickelte Software transformiert die klinische Forschung, indem sie es Unternehmen ermöglicht, Tests auf einem 21-CFR-Part-11-konformen System effizient durchzuführen.

Clinical Studio nutzt integrierte Software und native mobile Anwendungen, um den Aufbau, die Bereitstellung und das Management von klinischen Studien zu optimieren. Nutzer können eine nutzerdefinierte, vollständige und gebrandete Studie von Grund auf mit hochgradig konfigurierbaren Tools und ohne Programmierkenntnisse entwerfen und erstellen. Unternehmen können konforme Studien mit einer standortbasierten Dokumentenverwaltung, Versionskontrollfunktionen und einem Dateiverwaltungssystem bereitstellen, mit dem Nutzer Änderungen und Anpassungen an Studien verwalten und verfolgen sowie Probanden und Teilnehmer problemlos auf neue Studienversionen migrieren können.

Die papierlose Datenerfassung ist ein rationalisierter und organisierter Prozess mit dem csCoder, einem vollständig integrierten medizinischen Kodierungstool, das mit der Clinical-Studio-Plattform verfügbar ist und alle Daten, die eingegeben, aktualisiert oder gelöscht werden, mit detaillierten Audit-Trails verfolgt. Nutzer können mit dem Ad-hoc-Berichtsgenerator detaillierte Berichte erstellen und von jedem Mobiltelefon oder Tablet aus auf die Datenbank und die Wörterbücher für medizinische Kodierung zugreifen.


Bilder

TrialKit Software - 1
TrialKit Software - 2
TrialKit Software - 3
TrialKit Software - 4
5 weitere anzeigen
Videos zu TrialKit
TrialKit Software - 1
TrialKit Software - 2
TrialKit Software - 3
TrialKit Software - 4

Du bist nicht sicher, ob TrialKit das Richtige ist? Mit einer beliebten Alternative vergleichen

TrialKit

4,6 (33)
VS.

Startpreis

Keine Preise gefunden
Keine Preise gefunden

Preisoptionen

Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion
Kostenlose Version
Kostenlose Testversion

Funktionen

65
65

Integrationen

Keine Integrationen gefunden
8

Bedienkomfort

4,5 (33)
0,0 (0)

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

4,7 (33)
0,0 (0)

Kundenservice

4,9 (33)
0,0 (0)
Die grünen Bewertungsbalken geben an, welches Produkt gemessen an der Durchschnittsbewertung und der Zahl der Bewertungen am besten abschneidet.

Alternativen

EvidentIQ eCOA

0
Nr. 1 Alternative zu TrialKit
Die eCOA-Plattform (electronic Clinic Outcome Assessment) ermöglicht Unternehmen die Optimierung von Datenerfassungsproz...

Flex Databases platform

4,5
Nr. 2 Alternative zu TrialKit
Ein System für den klinischen Entwicklungsprozess und darüber hinaus. Skalierbares und flexibles CTMS mit allen...

Medrio

4,6
Nr. 3 Alternative zu TrialKit
Medrio ist ein Tool zur elektronischen Datenerfassung (EDC) für klinische Forschungsteams mit Tools zur Erfassung,...

Researchmanager – Clinical Research Suite

4,2
Nr. 4 Alternative zu TrialKit
Research Manager ist eine Online-Software zur Verwaltung klinischer Studien, die Organisationen bei der Planung,...

Nutzerbewertungen

Gesamtbewertung

4,6 /5
(33)
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,7/5
Funktionen
4,3/5
Bedienkomfort
4,5/5
Kundenbetreuung
4,9/5

Hast du TrialKit bereits?

Andere Softwarekäufer brauchen deine Hilfe! Produktbewertungen helfen uns allen, die richtigen Entscheidungen zu treffen.

Zeigt 5 von 33 Bewertungen
Margaret
Margaret
Gesamtbewertung
  • Branche: Pharmazeutika
  • Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung

Gesamtbewertung

  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
  • Bedienkomfort
  • Kundenbetreuung
  • Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10

Rapid Turnaround Time and Phenomenal Customer Service

Bewertet am 25.6.2021

Vorteile

It's not required that you hire a programmer to design and implement eCRFs with this system. The training and customer service team is so incredibly helpful. I was able to turn around an entire study's EDC setup within 3 weeks of getting contracts signed.

Nachteile

Each time I've identified a pain point or a feature that I would like or wanted to work better, it was updated in the next release. I don't currently have any unmet needs.

Antwort von Crucial Data Solutions

Hi Margaret,

Thank you so much for leaving this nice review of TrialKit. Our team is happy to hear you've been pleased with our customer support and that you were able to accelerate your study startup. We always appreciate your feedback on the platform and hope to support any of your future studies!

- Your Partners in Research, The Crucial Data Solutions Team

Stephen
Gesamtbewertung
  • Branche: Biotechnologie
  • Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung

Gesamtbewertung

  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
  • Bedienkomfort
  • Kundenbetreuung
  • Weiterempfehlungsquote 10.0 /10

TrialKit - Leadership that is transforming the biotechnology industry

Bewertet am 5.2.2022

Wonderful! I know that sounds short, but it really has been a system that I have grown to...

Wonderful! I know that sounds short, but it really has been a system that I have grown to appreciate and enjoy working within. The tech support and staff at TrialKIt are also a primary reason for my choice to go with TrialKit. Working with TrialKit allows the versatility to have a solution for my clients where I can contour the system to meet their needs.

Vorteile

Answered in previous section with regards to system performance

Nachteile

The only improvement I would recommend is the add the capability to schedule jobs to automatically generate reports and send them to a sFTP.

Antwort von Crucial Data Solutions

Hello Stephen,

Many thanks for your kind review of TrialKit and for choosing to work with us! We greatly appreciate your business and partnership. We look forward to supporting you and your clients' needs as time goes on!

- Your Partners in Research, The Crucial Data Solutions Team

Mindy
Gesamtbewertung
  • Branche: Medizinische Geräte
  • Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
  • Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung

Gesamtbewertung

  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
  • Bedienkomfort
  • Kundenbetreuung
  • Weiterempfehlungsquote 9.0 /10

Medical Device Start-up Experience with TrialKit

Bewertet am 16.12.2024

Wonderful! I would gladly recommend it to colleagues.

Wonderful! I would gladly recommend it to colleagues.

Vorteile

The team at Crucial Data Solutions had great customer service. They were promptly and consistently available to provide direct support during our build and throughout the study.

Nachteile

I used TrialKit before TrialKit AI became available. At the time, some of the reporting functionality was cumbersome, making it more difficult to capture key performance metrics for our trial. I look forward to trying the AI tools as we plan for our next study.

Antwort von Crucial Data Solutions

Thank you, Mindy, for your thoughtful review and for sharing your experience with TrialKit! We're thrilled to hear that our team’s customer support was a highlight during your study build and execution. We appreciate your feedback on the reporting functionality before the introduction of TrialKit AI, and we’re excited for you to try the enhanced AI tools in your next study. Your insights help us continue to improve and deliver solutions that meet your needs. Thank you for recommending us to your colleagues—we truly value your support!

Craig
Gesamtbewertung
  • Branche: Forschung
  • Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
  • Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung

Gesamtbewertung

  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
  • Bedienkomfort
  • Kundenbetreuung
  • Weiterempfehlungsquote 0.0 /10

Full of Bad, Buggy Programming

Bewertet am 3.10.2019

Dealing with Clinical Studio and, by extension, the support staff has been a lesson in abject...

Dealing with Clinical Studio and, by extension, the support staff has been a lesson in abject frustration. It is one of the most bug-filled, poorly written programs I have ever had to deal with. At this point though, I have poured hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars into setting up our data management within Clinical Studio, so it's essentially too late to switch to a competing EDC. No doubt many users are in a similar position to my own, allowing Clinical Studio to offer such a sub-par product with little to no repercussions.

Vorteile

At first I believed Clinical Studio was rather flexible and had lots of functionality. Unfortunately, the more I've used it, the more I've discovered that it is full of undocumented limitations (such as certain Conditional Logic types not working with certain Field types, for no clear reason) as well as hollow functionality (such as a button to copy and paste Conditional Logic from one Field to another Field in the TrialKit, though the button doesn't actually work).

Nachteile

The fact that most of the bugs and problems that I've run into with Clinical Studio are not new, yet are still not fixed, is infuriating. Often, when I contact support they tell me that they've seen the issue I'm describing in the past, and suggest a work-around for it. This "solution" only addresses the symptom, not the underlying problem (bugs in the developers' programming), and does nothing to prevent the issue from happening to myself or someone else in the future.

Antwort von Crucial Data Solutions

Craig,
Thank you for the feedback in this review. As President of Crucial Data Solutions I take all feedback seriously and view it as a learning opportunity for our company. I also appreciate you taking time to speak with me on the phone last week upon first learning about your frustrations. I've shared our conversation with our team and I know everyone is committed to providing you with more insight, support and guidance that I expect will have a positive effect on your experience with CDS.

With over 10,000 global users and overwhelming positive feedback, your situation is an outlier for us. Software inherently has bugs and challenges; how we address them is what we've been lauded for by the majority of our customer base. Unfortunately, we haven't done an adequate job in your case, so I plan to be personally involved to make sure we can set you up for success.

I look forward to supporting you moving forward and to a successful launch of your upcoming study.

Jeff Rogers

Sarah
Gesamtbewertung
  • Branche: Medizinische Geräte
  • Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung

Gesamtbewertung

  • Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
  • Bedienkomfort
  • Kundenbetreuung
  • Weiterempfehlungsquote 8.0 /10

Crucial Clinical Study Database review

Bewertet am 18.6.2020

Our business needed a cost-effective, easy-to-use solution that could support data capture for a...

Our business needed a cost-effective, easy-to-use solution that could support data capture for a complex, large-scale, global, medical device registry. Data collection would be significant in amount with varying types of information required. In addition, we anticipated that multiple database updates would be implemented in order to refine data collection and the system has demonstrated an ability to accommodate these needs. While the reporting and metric capabilities do provide some opportunities for future improvements within the software, we can still get to the information. Overall, our experience has been very positive and we would consider this platform for future studies without hesitation.

Vorteile

The process of working with the Crucial team was and continues to be seamless. It was easy to obtain/access the software. Our database developers used the software to create a database for a large, global clinical registry and the Crucial team has been very supportive of both the initial set-up as well as multiple updates to the database that have occurred along the way. We have been able to integrate the platform easily within our clinical processes and customer service has been exceptional.

Nachteile

Future development opportunities exist around reporting and metric-tracking. Specifically, improving capabilities for clinical trial metrics and auto-generated reports. Much of the current reporting requires that a user first exports the data followed by analysis and report generation through additional tools such as excel. While this is technically functional, it would be fantastic to have more common reports available in the software that would allow you to view key information within your data at the click of your mouse. For example, additional standard/customizable reports that contain aggregate data, summary information from your data, some data sorting capabilities, and tracking of metrics commonly used within a clinical trial stetting (e.g., monitoring metrics such as query aging, etc.) would make it even easier and faster to oversee any given clinical study.

Antwort von Crucial Data Solutions

Hi Sarah,
Many thanks for taking the time to leave this review review for TrialKit! It's wonderful to learn that you've had a positive experience with both the platform and our team.
We appreciate your input for future development opportunities; we've been listening to similar feedback over the last several months and have since implemented some excellent tools to provide more direct access to various study metrics without users needing to glean out the information on their own. In the meantime, there is a query aging report which can be viewed and/or exported via the TrialKit mobile app. CDS is currently in the midst of finalizing a new TrialKit module which provides robust business intelligence and analytics capabilities for cross-study reporting, providing interactive visualizations and animated reporting. Please stay tuned for further announcements related to these capabilities in the coming weeks.

- Your Partners in Research, The Crucial Data Solutions Team

5 von 33 Bewertungen angezeigt Alle Bewertungen

TrialKit Häufig gestellte Fragen

Weiter unter folgen häufig gestellte Fragen über TrialKit.

TrialKit bietet folgende Kostenpläne an:

  • Preismodell: Abonnement
  • Gratis Testen: Nicht verfügbar

TrialKit hat die folgenden typischen Kunden:

11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000

TrialKit unterstützt die folgenden Sprachen:

Chinesisch, Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch, Griechisch, Italienisch, Japanisch, Niederländisch, Norwegisch, Polnisch, Russisch, Schwedisch, Spanisch, Tschechisch, Ukrainisch

TrialKit unterstützt die folgenden Geräte:

Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil)

Wir haben keine Informationen darüber, welche Integrationen TrialKit hat

TrialKit bietet folgende Optionen für Kundensupport:

E-Mail/Helpdesk, Wissensdatenbank, Telefon-Support

Ähnliche Kategorien

Sieh alle für TrialKit gefundenen Softwarekategorien an.