--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu Diligent One Platform mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche Diligent One Platform mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Diligent One Platform Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Software für integriertes Risikomanagement](/directory/1759/integrated-risk-management/software) > [Diligent One Platform](/software/128219/highbond) # Diligent One Platform Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/128219/highbond Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/128219/highbond?page=2) > HighBond ist eine cloudbasierte GRC-Lösung, die Fachleuten dabei hilft, Abläufe im Zusammenhang mit Audits, Risikobewertungen, Untersuchungen, Forensik und mehr zu rationalisieren. Das zentralisierte Dashboard bietet Führungskräften einen Echtzeit-Überblick über potenzielle Risiken und Maßnahmen zur Risikominderung. > > Bewertung: **4.5/5** von 86 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.5/5** | 86 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Diligent - **Region**: New York, USA - **Gegründet**: 1998 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 5.000,00 $ - **Zielgruppe**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Belgien, Deutschland, Frankreich, Indonesien, Irland, Japan, Kanada, Luxemburg, Malaysia, Neuseeland, Philippinen, Schweiz, Singapur, Sonderverwaltungsregion Hongkong, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich, Österreich ## Funktionen - API - Abfrage-Generator - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Alerts/Escalation - Anpassbare Berichte - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Auditplanung - Aufgabenmanagement - BSA-Compliance - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Besteuerung & Bewertung - Betriebsrisiko-Management - Betrugserkennung - Compliance Management - Compliance-Verfolgung - Dashboard - Daten-Connectors ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Software für integriertes Risikomanagement](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1759/integrated-risk-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Software für integriertes Risikomanagement](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1759/integrated-risk-management/software) - [Compliance Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/243/compliance/software) - [Risikomanagement Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/246/risk-management/software) - [GRC-Tools (Governance, Risikomanagement und Compliance)](https://www.getapp.de/directory/251/governance-risk-compliance-grc/software) - [Audit Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/470/audit-compliance/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Google Cloud](https://www.getapp.de/software/122483/google-cloud-platform) — 4.7/5 (2282 reviews) 2. [Splunk Enterprise](https://www.getapp.de/software/122523/splunk) — 4.6/5 (262 reviews) 3. [Wix](https://www.getapp.de/software/90955/wix) — 4.4/5 (10668 reviews) 4. [Workday Adaptive Planning](https://www.getapp.de/software/90888/adaptive-planning) — 4.5/5 (231 reviews) 5. [LogicGate Risk Cloud](https://www.getapp.de/software/103623/logicgate) — 4.7/5 (83 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Efficient and Effective" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *9. Juni 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Integration between different bonds within the platform > > **Nachteile**: No policy bond available in the region until now > > The audit process is highly integrated by using the Audit bond ----- ### "Easy to implement, learn, and use" — 5.0/5 > **Andrew** | *7. Dezember 2021* | Maschinerie | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The best part of Highbond is that it is an intuitive platform that is easy to implement, learn, and use. Our implementation went very smoothly and was ready much faster than I expected. That allowed us to start learning how to navigate and create steps and attributes within the tool. The online training helped us get started quickly. Soon after the prototype was delivered, we were creating our tracking and steps for our audits. Our user group of 40+ auditors worldwide were able to use the platform with minimal training just because it was so intuitive. We are now working on various reports and other summaries to speed up our monthly reporting. > > **Nachteile**: The report writing feature is a little clunky and slow to generate reports. There could also be more easily placed custom fields. Once you learn the the logic behind the reporting fields and how they are grouped, it gets somewhat easier, but there are still some fields in the tool that cannot be pulled into reports. ----- ### "USer review" — 4.0/5 > **Albert** | *3. September 2019* | Hochschulbildung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Easy to learn compared to some of the other programs that I have used in the past. > > **Nachteile**: Navigating from one screen to the next is sometimes a challenge. ----- ### "My HighBond implementation journey" — 4.0/5 > **Elodie** | *9. Juni 2021* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The product is quite easy to use the moment you define the best way to use it. And that's the real challenge according to me\!\! Choose the best flow takes time and this brainstorming activity is more often time consuming and under estimated. There are always several configuration possibilities to achieve our client's goals. Depending its maturity, its licenses subscription and the time he has to allocate to the implementation phase. Results is very often a part of the solution and thanks to Robots we can always manager tricky situations and propose workaround when needed. > > **Nachteile**: I think thaht there are too many clicks in Projects to get on the right page. I also find that Contributor and Oversight user profiles are not very easy to understand... Another comment in Results: when you want to apply a filter you need to click twice, not user friendly. Morover, it could be very useful to add computed field in Results rather than using a Robots for that. It could help clients to create better reporting without having ACL for Windows skills\! > > I'm working as professional services team. The most common business needs implemented so far are related to Internal Control (mainly with Results) or Internal Audit (standard way of Projects use). ERM is barely key to our clients. And when it is, the link between Strategy App and Projects is not so easy to understand. The new geographical visualization is very good news\! We were asking for it for many years ;-) ----- ### "New Sheriff in Town" — 4.0/5 > **David** | *9. März 2022* | Bankwesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The analytics are the main reason we went with HighBond. The ability to analyze thousands of credit card transactions and within minutes identify the outlier transactions was extremely beneficial to the organization. Gas card theft and personal purchases made with a company card were easily identified and it didn't take long for the news to spread throughout the organization. A new sheriff arrived in town. > > **Nachteile**: For our organization the GRC part of the software was a little clunky and manual to setup and use on a regular basis. Having to identify the risks and then enter the controls in a different area and then having to link the two of them together, made the process cumbersome and we had pushback from auditors that did not want to use the software. > > You get what you pay for and the analytics is what we wanted. We were not disappointed. I don't know if I would do the GRC portion of the software again, or if I would negotiate a little better for that portion. ----- Seite: 1 / 5\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/128219/highbond?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/128219/highbond) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten