--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu BrowserStack mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche BrowserStack mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: BrowserStack Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Lasttest-Tools](/directory/1959/load-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/170655/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/170655/browserstack Seite: 1 / 32\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack ist eine browserübergreifende Testplattform, mit der Entwickler Tools integrieren können, um automatisierte, visuelle und Live-Tests über mobile Anwendungen und Websites hinweg durchzuführen. DevOps-Teams können auch lokale Tests für WIP-Anwendungen (Work in Progress) durchführen, ohne sie in öffentlichen Umgebungen zu hosten. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 776 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 776 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: BrowserStack - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 39,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Australien, Brasilien, Britische Jungferninseln, Deutschland, Dänemark, Indien, Irland, Israel, Kanada, Mexiko, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - A/B Testing - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Aktivitätsüberwachung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Alerts/Escalation - Anforderungsbasiertes Testen - Anforderungsmanagement - Anmerkungen - Anomalieerkennung - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Fragen - Anpassbare Kategorien - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Automated Testing ## Integrationen (73 insgesamt) - APS Payroll - AWS Cloud9 - AWS Lambda - Android Studio - Appium - Asana - Atlas - Azure DevOps Labs - Azure DevOps Server - Azure DevTest Labs - Azure Pipelines - Azure SQL Database - Birdeye - Birdseye - BitBrowser ... und 58 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Lasttest-Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1959/load-testing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Lasttest-Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1959/load-testing/software) - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/3879/test-management-tools/software) - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/389/testing/software) - [Generative KI-Tools](https://www.getapp.de/directory/3874/generative-ai/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/2075/user-testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [TestRail](https://www.getapp.de/software/112767/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 2. [WebLOAD](https://www.getapp.de/software/1999307/webload) — 4.2/5 (9 reviews) 3. [SpiraTest](https://www.getapp.de/software/90468/spiratest) — 4.0/5 (104 reviews) 4. [Userlytics](https://www.getapp.de/software/121415/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 5. [Hotjar](https://www.getapp.de/software/101789/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (545 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Reliable Cross-Platform Testing with Some Cost Considerations" — 4.0/5 > **Azmal** | *2. April 2026* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The biggest advantage of BrowserStack is its instant access to a wide range of real devices without needing to maintain physical hardware. The ability to perform live, manual testing on both iOS and Android devices directly from the browser is extremely convenient and saves a lot of setup time. I also found the platform very useful for: Quick debugging with real-time interaction Consistent performance across devices and OS versions Ease of use — no complex installation or configuration required Reliable cloud infrastructure, which makes testing smooth even for remote teams Overall, it significantly improves testing efficiency and helps identify real-world issues that emulators often miss. > > **Nachteile**: The main drawback is the cost, especially for small teams or when you need extended access to real devices for manual testing. I also faced a few practical limitations: Session time limits and concurrency restrictions can slow down testing when multiple testers are involved Occasional lag or latency, particularly when network conditions aren’t ideal Limited free access, making it harder to evaluate thoroughly before committing Device availability issues at peak times (some popular devices are not always instantly accessible) > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It provides a reliable and efficient platform for testing applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need to maintain physical infrastructure. The ability to perform live, manual testing on real iOS and Android devices is a major advantage, helping to identify real-world issues that are often missed in emulators. The platform is easy to use, quick to set up, and integrates well into existing testing workflows. However, there are some limitations, such as pricing, session limits, and occasional latency, which can impact productivity during heavy usage. Overall, it is a powerful and practical solution for cross-platform testing, especially for teams that need quick access to multiple devices, but it may require careful cost management depending on usage. ----- ### "BrowserStack addressed our all-testing requirements well." — 5.0/5 > **Thiwanka** | *30. September 2025* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Detailed Test Results Dashboard - For Automation Testing they provide very advanced dashboard, and it includes all test results, logs, screen recording videos and with many more details. This is well worth the money we paid. Sharable Public URL For All Test - We can get public URL for each test that we run on BrowserStack. So this test result management is very usefull and no need to manage results in another place. It is very useful for explaining issue to other teams. Their device farms have high security level and no risk at all. 24x7 Support Team and Learning Material availability - They response our support tickets within few hours and also, they have technical support teams to solve our technical gaps. > > **Nachteile**: Pricing for the Parelle tests might me high for startups or small groups. But they have very flexible sales team, and we can chat and get discounts for annual plans, and you can negotiate the price. > > We choose BrowserStack as our device farm to run our Android and iOS mobile automation suites on pipelines. From the initial stage to now they gave unbelievable supports to make this goal success and when we are facing any issue their support teams assign ASAP and solve all issued that we faced. ----- ### "Focus on Future Nitche" — 3.0/5 > **Acharaj** | *1. April 2026* | Informationsdienst | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Its Test Bed capacities Its Evaluation Matrix Improvisation (which is not live yet) All in one solution > > **Nachteile**: Self Healing Feature is still not up to the mark Prompt Design Engg \& Self Feedback Looping- You should be focusing on this more. This is the backbone of AI generated tests. Less competitive as compare to their nitche players > > Good, but i think product should be taking a deep review of the other good players in market like TestIM, Promptfoo.com for different features. From there they can get some references \& get good features implemented. ----- ### "Def worth the money, some things could be better\!" — 4.0/5 > **Oleksiy** | *23. März 2026* | Marketing & Werbung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I use BrowserStack to test sites, HTML5 creatives, and other things related to HTML behavior on devices. I like that there are so many different devices to choose from, as well as a variety of browsers and browser versions available. It's super helpful and all of that works well with VPN too. The initial account setup was very easy, and we had an account manager to assist us. > > **Nachteile**: The network console is often buggy and does not capture network events sometimes. The console would also oftentimes get disconnected, which means that you have to re-start the device. > > Overall, the experience is rather positive and the tool is very helpful especially for mobile tests. It helps to bypass bot-traffic blocks, providing a reliable testing environment compared to emulators. ----- ### "Great Tool for Mobile Automation Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Shubham** | *15. Oktober 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I would say the ease of initial setup, Jenkins and Github Actions integrations and the ability to quickly debug different test logs in case of failures by looking at the videos for the test runs. > > **Nachteile**: Once every few months, we do run into false failures due to a bad state on the device but generally it gets addressed quite quickly. > > We use BrowserStack to do automated testing of our Android App in conjunction with Espresso and Android Instrumentation test framework. We have quite a complex app and a lot of automated tests around it that we run on every PR with a Jenkins integration. The overall setup has been quite helpful for us to catch any bugs on the Github PR itself and has helped greatly in increasing our app stability and stopped us from shipping critical bugs on a lot of occasions. The overall experience of setup and running BrowserStack has been quite easy for us. ----- Seite: 1 / 32\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/170655/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/170655/browserstack) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten