--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu Descript mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche Descript mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Descript Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Videobearbeitungsprogramme](/directory/1385/video-editing/software) > [Descript](/software/2036215/descript) # Descript Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/2036215/descript Seite: 1 / 9\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/2036215/descript?page=2) > Descript ist eine Transkriptionssoftware, die für Unternehmen in verschiedenen Branchen wie Marketing, Vertrieb, Nutzerforschung, Onlinelernen und Kundenbetreuung entwickelt wurde. Die Lösung hilft Teammitgliedern, an Projekten zusammenzuarbeiten, Feedback zu senden, freigegebene Ordner zu erstellen, Kommentare hinzuzufügen und Dokumentenversionen nachzuverfolgen. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 183 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 183 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Descript - **Gegründet**: 2017 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 15,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Kanada, Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - AI Voices - API - Anmerkungen - Anrufaufzeichnung - Anruftext-Aufzeichnung - Audio Editor - Audio Manipulation - Audio Mixing - Audio- / Video-Dateiupload - Audioaufnahme - Audioaufzeichnung - Aufzeichnung bei Bedarf - Automatische Formatierung - Automatische Transkription - Automatische Transkription - Backup und Recovery - Benutzer-Management - Bildbearbeitung - Bildbibliothek - Bildschirmaufnahme ## Integrationen (9 insgesamt) - Asana - Box - Dropbox - Evernote Teams - Gmail - Google Drive - OneDrive - Slack - Zapier ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Videobearbeitungsprogramme](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1385/video-editing/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Videobearbeitungsprogramme](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1385/video-editing/software) - [Transkriptionssoftware](https://www.getapp.de/directory/2035/transcription/software) - [Spracherkennungssoftware](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1537/speech-recognition/software) - [Software für Bildschirmaufzeichnung](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1751/screen-recording/software) - [Audiobearbeitungssoftware](https://www.getapp.de/directory/2055/audio-editing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Movavi Video Editor Plus](https://www.getapp.de/software/2049702/movavi-video-editor-plus) — 4.8/5 (1135 reviews) 2. [Riverside](https://www.getapp.de/software/2064508/riverside) — 4.8/5 (311 reviews) 3. [AVS Video Editor](https://www.getapp.de/software/2048972/avs-video-editor) — 4.5/5 (520 reviews) 4. [DaVinci Resolve](https://www.getapp.de/software/2026463/davinci-resolve) — 4.8/5 (273 reviews) 5. [Filmora](https://www.getapp.de/software/1989287/filmora) — 4.5/5 (736 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Works well - with some crucial gaps" — 4.0/5 > **Justin** | *26. Februar 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Liked the AI Voiceover, and the whole recording experience. The webapp is simple to use and learning curve is comparatively less. Making your own AI voice as well working pretty well. > > **Nachteile**: AI Avatar generation is pretty bad. Unlike AI voice, avatar feels very basic. Descript misses couple of important feature like Zoom in while recording - i don't a how a recording tool can miss that out. > > Happy with overall descript experience. Script writing, recording, basic editing are working well. Not being a designer - I can release product demo videos easily ----- ### "Makes editing a podcast so much easier\!" — 5.0/5 > **Bryan** | *23. Juni 2021* | Bekleidung & Mode | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's very easy to use as a novice. There are lots of functionality buried within that I know I'm not utilizing, but I don't need it to get my job done. I love the ability to edit the audio by editing text and adding music onto my podcast voice files is straightforward. This is by far the easiest editing tool I've tried. > > **Nachteile**: There are lots of features that I know exist but that I don't see or that I don't know how or when I should use them. This is on me to learn, but I do wish tools would provide access to mini-tutorials from within the main workspace so that when you are working you could better identify whether that functionality you've never used might help to solve your problem. > > It's been great. We started a podcast with no background in audio production and were doing fine with Audacity, but Descript just changed what we felt we could do, and how much time it takes to do it. I've recommended it to many people already and I expect I'll recommend it to many more. ----- ### "Use Riverside.fm" — 2.0/5 > **Matt** | *22. Juni 2025* | Sport | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: In-line editor works okay. Highlighting to create scenes is a feature I’m glad they have. Export to google docs is a + for speed. > > **Nachteile**: -Classic money capture play. Calling it “seats” might make you think you’re Salesforce, but you’re target market is mainly one man or woman shows trying to learn. Licking people up for a year doesn’t sold your problem of achieving consistently growing ARR, having the best product for your target market does that. -Bait and switch on features for Hobbyist necessitates upgrade to higher price tier level for feature that should be built in. Money trap, then bait and switch. -No export into reel format video; means to do this you have to stretch and lose video quality. > > Fine. Customer service does their thing when you try to get your money back because the product just doesn’t quite fit. Go use Riverside.fm for the same thing for cheaper with better quality, better features, more customization, and reel format export. ----- ### "Excellent for podcast editing" — 5.0/5 > **Rowan** | *23. Juni 2021* | Unterhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Being able to edit text and have that automatically edit the audio is an amazing time saver. I was skeptical of the quality of edits this would provide, but 95% of the time the cross fades etc. it adds are spot on. For that 5% of the time where it's not quite right, you can easily adjust things using the waveform editor. > > **Nachteile**: The transcription service seems to have been primarily trained on white/European-descent speakers. I've edited several episodes with African guests and the transcription is awful. You can still use it to edit the audio OK, with some laughs at the mistakes it made. But, if you want to publish a transcript then you're basically rewriting the whole thing. > > I love Descript and have recommended it to several other podcast editors who now use it too. I use it for a "story edit" of each episode, taking the full audio then chopping and rearranging it, plus taking out filler words etc. You can do compression/EQ/music/bumpers/etc. in Descript but I prefer to export to a full blown DAW for that part. Descript would be great for this stuff if you are editing your own podcast and audio engineering isn't your primary focus. ----- ### "The future of podcasting is still just over the horizon" — 4.0/5 > **Aemyn** | *20. Mai 2021* | Onlinemedien | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Descript is a strong collection of audio tools that just weren't available when I started making podcasts. The ability to organise, collaborate and publish an audio project in the cloud with a friendly interface is great and used to be a huge pain to figure out. Editing audio with the transcript and the waveform at the same time allows you to skip a bunch of technicalities and focus on your creativity. Video capabilities expand the possibilities, and the overall suite of tools make me rethink entirely what podcast editing can or should be in a good way. > > **Nachteile**: Stability is the biggest problem I have with this. After working on about a lot of different projects with different collaborators, I'm still coming up against things that make it freeze, make it crash, or break a project (usually salvageable at least), and end up needing to work around issues to keep things rolling. Also, while Descript has a lot of features, in comparison to any long-standing audio software it leaves so much to be desired. There are many missing tools that would add a lot of room for creativity and technical cleanup. Things like audio meters, noise gate, spectrum analysis, filters to automate creatively, ducking, but also the more unexpected effects like reverb, stereo delay, pitch shifting, layered FX, these are all things podcasters of any kind might want to use for effect at some point and many folks I know can't, or don't want to tell their stories without them. This is especially true for video which misses on some basic transformations like rotation for text and images. > > Overall, using Descript is a super positive experience. We're able to preview episode scripts with clients which makes the approval process a better experience for them. Our scriptwriters are able to work directly with the audio and transcript at the same time and when they're done, we can export the raw project for cleanup and sound design in an external DAW which is awesome forethought from Descript. With other projects, editing and sound design and exporting can be done entirely in Descript and I'm really happy with the results. Despite its limitations and bugs, I still struggle not to recommend Descript to anyone making a podcast. Whatever you're doing, there is a good chance you will find a place for it in your process, just maybe not as much or as reliably as you would like. ----- Seite: 1 / 9\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/2036215/descript?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/2036215/descript) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten