--- description: Ausführliche Erfahrungsberichte zu GitHub mit detaillierten Infos zu Funktionen, Preisen und Bewertungen. Verschaff dir einen schnellen Überblick zu Benutzerfreundlichkeit, Vor- und Nachteilen & vergleiche GitHub mit ähnlichen Produkten. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: GitHub Erfahrungen, Kosten & Bewertungen | GetApp Deutschland 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Issue Tracking Software](/directory/580/issue-tracking/software) > [GitHub](/software/90537/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.getapp.de/software/90537/github Seite: 1 / 247\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/90537/github?page=2) > GitHub ist der beste Ort zum Teilen von Codes mit Freunden, Kollegen, Mitschülern und fremden Personen. Über eine Million Menschen nutzen GitHub, um zusammen erstaunliche Dinge zu kreieren. Mit den kollaborativen Funktionen von GitHub.com, unseren Desktop- und Mobilapps sowie GitHub Enterprise war es für Einzelpersonen und Teams noch nie so einfach, schneller einen besseren Code zu schreiben. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 6150 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 6150 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Microsoft - **Region**: Redmond, USA - **Gegründet**: 1975 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 4,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Belarus, Belgien, Brasilien, Bulgarien, China, Deutschland, Dänemark, Estland, Finnland, Frankreich, Indien, Indonesien, Irak, Island, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Kroatien, Lettland und 27 weitere ## Funktionen - @mentions - Agile Methodiken - Anfragenmanagement - Anwendungssicherheit - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Authentifizierung - Automated Testing - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Bug-/Problemerfassung - Code-Bearbeitung - Code-Entwicklung - Codeprüfung - Continuous Integration - Dashboard - Daten-Import / -Export - Debuggen - Etikettierung - Feedback-Management ## Integrationen (13 insgesamt) - CircleCI - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Visual Studio Code ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank ## Category - [Issue Tracking Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/580/issue-tracking/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Issue Tracking Software](https://www.getapp.de/directory/580/issue-tracking/software) - [Bugtracker](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.getapp.de/directory/1477/source-code-management/software) - [Programmiersoftware](https://www.getapp.de/directory/370/application-development/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools für gemeinnützige Organisationen](https://www.getapp.de/directory/2875/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Zoho Projects](https://www.getapp.de/software/9910/zoho-projects) — 4.5/5 (852 reviews) 2. [GitLab](https://www.getapp.de/software/112635/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1213 reviews) 3. [Bitbucket](https://www.getapp.de/software/91554/bitbucket) — 4.6/5 (1343 reviews) 4. [Jira](https://www.getapp.de/software/9953/jira) — 4.4/5 (15298 reviews) 5. [Wrike](https://www.getapp.de/software/9964/wrike) — 4.4/5 (2879 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Best code storage platform ever made" — 5.0/5 > **Pratik** | *2. März 2025* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is a one of the best platform to store the code and allow team members to work on same project simultaneously without having conflicts. > > **Nachteile**: As I used git hub to store my store far more there was no cons I got for it, It was very easy to learn just had little tricky to understand UI to resolve conflicts which issue was resolved in git desktop (application of git hub). > > I had great experience with Git hub which made my code easily available from any device, there was also in build deploy feature for static web application, It best and most recommended platform to learn. ----- ### "Github gets a thumbs up" — 5.0/5 > **Tony** | *22. September 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Having used git locally for quite some time, github seemed the natural progression. I've tried other systems (BitBucket and GitLab and many many years ago SourceSafe which wasnt online, it was a LAN based product). I used github prior to its purchase by Microsoft and was pleased to see that whereas previously private repo's needed a paid account, since Microsofts purchase, you can now have private repo's on their free service. Recently I've started getting into CI/CD and so have been getting involved in the Actions service, which gives you build time on their servers for deployment. I'd used AWS previously for CI/CD and found the Github actions were far easier to set up and they provide a reasonable amount of processor minutes per month for free which I haven't yet breached so it's a free service there too\! Not only is it a remote repository for tracking changes and allowing multiple people to develop in the same system, it also provides a remote offsite backup of your source. As far as value for money is concerned, its brilliant because it's free but even if you go for the paid option, the last time I checked it was about £7 a month > > **Nachteile**: The secret variables that you can create in actions are a "write once, never see them again" system. Variables can be used in Actions to control what you want the build script to do based on which branch you are in - ie one variable might be created for the master branch for live builds and another for staging or dev builds. I know they are secrets but sometimes it can be really helpful to check what the value is to try to debug what might be happening in the build process (even if you echo the value during the build process, most of the output is replaced with \*\*\*\*). It would be useful to require re-entry of username/password and 2fa details and to then be shown the details - even if each variable needed to go through the same process > > Overall its a good system, the best source control system I've used and whenever you search online for code, its github that tends to be the place other people use to store their open source contributions - you don't often see others being used, although I have seen GitLab more than anything else. ----- ### "Very Confusing to Use" — 2.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *24. August 2024* | Einzelhandel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 2.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Nothing. I couldn't figure out how to use it. > > **Nachteile**: It was very confusing - once I logged in, I could go no further > > I was able to sign p easily, but after that I was totally lost ----- ### "Trustworthy repository hub of campaign technology." — 5.0/5 > **William** | *26. Dezember 2025* | Marketing & Werbung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I also prefer the ease with which changes can be reviewed, actions can be triggered and everyone can be coordinated in situations that require quick approvals on the campaign. > > **Nachteile**: I do not like that first structure and approvals may bewilder other team members who are not technical and I tend to take them through the fundamentals. > > It has proved to be a reliable source of scripts, landing pages, and automation regarding our mobile campaigns without stalling the sales impetus. ----- ### "Great for Collaboration and Code Management" — 5.0/5 > **Bonface** | *3. Mai 2025* | Finanzdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I like most about GitHub is how seamless it makes collaboration across development teams. The ability to track changes through version control, manage branches, and open pull requests has really helped us maintain clean and organized codebases. The GitHub Actions automation feature also saves a lot of time during deployment. It’s reliable and easy to integrate with other tools we already use. > > **Nachteile**: One thing that can be a bit confusing, especially for newer team members, is the learning curve with Git commands and how branching works. While the platform itself is great, it sometimes assumes a certain level of experience with version control, which can slow things down for beginners. Also, the notifications can get overwhelming if you’re watching multiple repositories. > > My experience with GitHub has been very positive overall. It’s a reliable platform for hosting code, managing projects, and collaborating with others. Whether I’m working solo or with a team, GitHub helps keep everything organized through issues, pull requests, and commits. Over time, it’s become a central part of my workflow, and it integrates well with other tools like VS Code and Slack. There’s a bit of a learning curve at the start, but once you get used to it, it really improves how you manage code. ----- Seite: 1 / 247\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.getapp.de/software/90537/github?page=2) ## Links - [Auf GetApp anzeigen](https://www.getapp.de/software/90537/github) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten