Bitbucket

Kostenloser Quellcode für Git und Mercurial von Bitbucket

4,6 /5 (876 Bewertungen) Eine Bewertung verfassen!

Bitbucket Übersicht

Was ist Bitbucket?

Erledige deine Arbeit mit Bitbucket, einer Git-Lösung für professionelle Teams. Arbeite gemeinsam im Team am Code – mit Diskussionen direkt im Quellcode, Inline-Kommentaren oder diskutiere und überprüfe Änderungen über Pull-Requests.

Unbegrenzter private Speicher

Speichern, Versionserstellung und Bearbeitung von Code mit kostenfreien, unbegrenzten privaten Repositories.

JIRA-Integration

Verknüpfe jedes Commit mit einem Jira-Bug oder einer Entwicklungsaufgabe oder wechsle automatisch zwischen Jira-Issues, während du mit Bitbucket arbeitest.

Integrierte kontinuierliche Lieferung

Pipelines ist direkt in der Bitbucket Cloud integriert und bietet dir End-to-End-Transparenz von der Programmierung bis zur Bereitstellung.

Bitbucket Übersicht

Kosten

Beginnt ab
N/A

Preisoptionen

Gratis Testen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Bitbucket Funktionen

Geräte
Unternehmensgröße
K M G
Märkte
Asien, Australien, Europa, Vereinigtes Königreich, Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika
Unterstützte Sprachen
Englisch

Screenshots

Bitbucket Screenshot:
Bitbucket Screenshot: Bitbucket Screenshot: Bitbucket Screenshot: Bitbucket Screenshot: Bitbucket Screenshot:

Bitbucket Bewertungen

Bitbucket Bewertungen

Gesamtbewertung
4,6
/
5
Ausgezeichnet
545

Sehr gut
284

Durchschnitt
43

Gering
3

Schlecht
1

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,5
Funktionen
4,5
Bedienkomfort
4,4
Kundenbetreuung
4,3
95% haben diese Anwendung empfohlen
Carlos david M.

Bitbucket - The Enterprise alternative to GitHub

I have used Bitbucket in multiple scenarios. But mostly for Software Development with Scrum Board. Although I have used KANABN as well. I have experience both as project administrator and as regular user.


Mit Google übersetzen
Verifizierter Rezensent

Best repository management platform out there

Overall, our teams love BitBucket and we use it daily. We host our code up there and this allows us to review, manage, and share our code directly to all teams. It's easy to do things like set permissions or integrate other tools like Jira which make the platform even more robust than it already is. Although a bit pricey as you scale with your engineers, it's generally a cost-effective platform given your business size that is unmatched in repository management software and allows us to build products with a sense of peace and security.


Mit Google übersetzen
Nadheesh J.

Bitbucket: an alternative remote git repository

I used Bitbucket as a remote git repository for many of my projects that involve groups. At first, it was a great product, it makes the collaboration among my team much easier when developing large software systems. However, I do not see a significant advantage of using Bitbucket instead of the most widely used alternative. I would expect more from Bitbucket to continuously use that.


Mit Google übersetzen
Adrian C.

Started as a great product, but I got disappointed

Brilliant from 7 years go until approx 3 years ago. Painful to use for the last 3 years and we are currently migrating everything to GitHub.


Mit Google übersetzen
Veljko Z.

Very easy to use, but lacking some needs for enterprise (non-crucial though)

We never had any showstopper issues with it, everything simply seems to be working on it's own. It provides enough integration points for CI/CD pipelines and maintenance has never been an issue. We've been using it for years on a mid-big project without issues (~2M lines of code, 4 years worth of active development, now with around ~50 people), and also on some other with client having huge project (~20M lines, ~7 years, ~150 people at the moment).


Mit Google übersetzen
Carlos david M.
Branche: Finanzdienstleistungen
Untern. Größe: 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Übersetzen auf: Deutsch

Bitbucket - The Enterprise alternative to GitHub

Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
Bewertet am 6.12.2019
Quelle der Bewertung: Capterra

I have used Bitbucket in multiple scenarios. But mostly for Software Development with Scrum Board. Although I have used KANABN as well. I have experience both as project administrator and as regular user.

Vorteile

Bitbucket is private repository with lots of feature and multiple language support.
In my daily use, I mostly commit Java applications using the scrum board.
I have used the cloud version for almost three years. In my previous company and now at my current one.
One of the best features is the code review following the git flow workflow. You can select the source and target branch for the pull request and you can select default approvers as well as define your own one.

Nachteile

The project administration, especially the setup of the permissions for a particular repository tends to be quite hard. And when you try to contact support, usually there is no help at all and you end up researching on forums to be able to find the answer you're looking for.
In this kind of software, especially if a company like Attlassian is behind it, the support should be better.

Verteilung der Bewertung

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Bedienkomfort
Kundenbetreuung

Weiterempfehlungsquote: 8.0/10

Verifizierter Rezensent
Branche: Immobilien
Untern. Größe: 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Übersetzen auf: Deutsch

Best repository management platform out there

Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
Bewertet am 19.8.2019
Quelle der Bewertung: Capterra

Overall, our teams love BitBucket and we use it daily. We host our code up there and this allows us to review, manage, and share our code directly to all teams. It's easy to do things like set permissions or integrate other tools like Jira which make the platform even more robust than it already is. Although a bit pricey as you scale with your engineers, it's generally a cost-effective platform given your business size that is unmatched in repository management software and allows us to build products with a sense of peace and security.

Vorteile

I think the biggest pro with using Bitbucket is that it integrates extremely well with JIRA. This allows you to track your tickets with the branches you're working on and to easily see its progress during each sprint. It's intuitive and straightforward to use. It's also quick and almost rarely did we have any technical issues. Whenever we did have some issue, it was just with some expiring licenses which was easy to resolve. Permissions are additionally easy to manage. Overall, it's just an amazing tool that is 100% essential for our software team as it manages our repositories and allows to share, review, and manage our code across all teams.

Nachteile

The only downside I can think of is the scaling costs associated with it for the paid plans. Bitbucket charges per user. We have around 100 software engineers so it adds up a lot. Also, our engineers are quite experienced so working in Bitbucket hasn't been that much of a challenge. I've heard that engineers will lesser experience in repository management find Github to be easier to learn and implement but again, with greater experience comes a more expansive toolset.

Verteilung der Bewertung

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Bedienkomfort
Kundenbetreuung

Weiterempfehlungsquote: 9.0/10

Nadheesh J.
Branche: Programmentwicklung
Untern. Größe: 501-1.000 Mitarbeiter
Übersetzen auf: Deutsch

Bitbucket: an alternative remote git repository

Weitere für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
Bewertet am 10.6.2020
Quelle der Bewertung: Capterra

I used Bitbucket as a remote git repository for many of my projects that involve groups. At first, it was a great product, it makes the collaboration among my team much easier when developing large software systems. However, I do not see a significant advantage of using Bitbucket instead of the most widely used alternative. I would expect more from Bitbucket to continuously use that.

Vorteile

Bitbucket has all the features offered by the most widely used remote git repositories and offers much more with free version compared to the alternative products.

Nachteile

The features are so similar to the alternative solution, and therefore this solution fails to produce a better experience compared to those alternatives. Thus cannot justify using Bitbucket instead of its competitors.

Verteilung der Bewertung

Bedienkomfort

Weiterempfehlungsquote: 8.0/10

Adrian C.
Branche: Computer-Software
Untern. Größe: 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Übersetzen auf: Deutsch

Started as a great product, but I got disappointed

Monatlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
Bewertet am 8.1.2020
Quelle der Bewertung: Capterra

Brilliant from 7 years go until approx 3 years ago. Painful to use for the last 3 years and we are currently migrating everything to GitHub.

Vorteile

We started implementing version control using Mercurial about 7 years ago (in my own company). On the advice of a colleague at the time we used Mercurial as opposed to Git. Bitbucket worked perfectly with Mercurial when we needed it at the time and really helped our business. It was fast easy to use and understand and the online UI kept getting better and better.

Nachteile

In the last 3 years, pushing and pulling and doing any kind of actions became tediously slow. I copied some of the repos to GitHub and converted to Git to check it was not a problem with my repo, with my computer, or with the software I was using (SourceTree). In all cases the only difference was using a Mercurial versus Git repo on BitBucket. I got no response to my support query, and no response to a forum post as to the issue and when it would be fixed. I then made a decision for our entire company to move all of it's repos to GitHub and stop using BitBucket - we are doing this right now. Approx 1 year after the decision was made, BitBucket emailed all it's customers to say they would be discontinuing support for Mercurial as not enough of their customer base used it. However there was no suggestion of helping migrate all repos to Git, no support docs on how to do this and honestly this was too little too late for us. We had become so annoyed with BitBucket that we would have migrated regardless.

Verteilung der Bewertung

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Bedienkomfort
Kundenbetreuung

Weiterempfehlungsquote: 0.0/10

Veljko Z.
Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
Untern. Größe: 1.001-5.000 Mitarbeiter
Übersetzen auf: Deutsch

Very easy to use, but lacking some needs for enterprise (non-crucial though)

Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
Bewertet am 27.4.2020
Quelle der Bewertung: Capterra

We never had any showstopper issues with it, everything simply seems to be working on it's own. It provides enough integration points for CI/CD pipelines and maintenance has never been an issue. We've been using it for years on a mid-big project without issues (~2M lines of code, 4 years worth of active development, now with around ~50 people), and also on some other with client having huge project (~20M lines, ~7 years, ~150 people at the moment).

Vorteile

First thing to note is there's two versions of the software - self hosted and cloud hosted on bitbucket.com. Make sure you know what you're buying as those two vary sometimes significantly in features (e.g. lack of automerge branches in cloud hosted version, which might be a showstopper for you). However, they're constantly putting out updates, so make sure to check the latest version comparisons. In general, the cloud version is the 'skinny one'.
Reviewing changes has always been a breeze and the major strong point of bitbucket - it's very easy to start comments, reply, assign tasks, require min number of approvals before merging, etc.
The support for git-flow is seamless - the versioning is working always as expected, with auto-merge down to the correct branch detected correctly.
We have setup a build engine to it so you can't merge a branch that's failing builds, which works great.
The overview of code, branches, PRs is working great, the full-text search throughout entire codebase is amazingly fast (although, it's lacking some basic filters).

Nachteile

Some pull requests are limited to review only the 1000 files - this is unfortunate, because if you have very large projects and with some refactoring you're easily over that number, this doesn't give you ability to see that-very-specific project files you want to check upon. It's annoying as there doesn't seem to be any good reason for the limit.
If you have large teams (e.g. imagine 160 people, split into 15 teams), you can't group people which would be useful to see ("PR's of my team" for example would be a nice feature to have).
Also missing is what's seen nowadays in github - a recognition for the language that's shown.

Verteilung der Bewertung

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Bedienkomfort

Weiterempfehlungsquote: 8.0/10

Nutzerempfehlung
8,7/10
Basierend auf 876 Benutzerbewertungen
Vergleiche Nutzerempfehlungen mit Alternativen
Mit Alternativen vergleichen

Bitbucket Preis

Bitbucket Preis

Beginnt ab
N/A
Gratis Testen
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,5/5
Basierend auf 876 Benutzerbewertungen
Vergleiche das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis mit Alternativen
Mit Alternativen vergleichen

Bitbucket Funktionen

Bitbucket Funktionen

API
Aktivitäts-Dashboard
Aktivitäts-Verfolgung
Automatische Benachrichtigungen
Berichterstattung und Statistik
Compliance Management
Daten-Import / -Export
Datenvisualisierung
Drag-and-Drop-Oberfläche
Echtzeit-Daten
Echtzeitüberwachung
Genehmigungs-Management
Integration von Dritten
Rollen-basierte Genehmigung
Warnungen / Eskalation
Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit
Wirtschaftsprüfung
Workflow-Management
Zugriffskontrolle
Überwachung
Funktionen
4,5/5
Basierend auf 876 Benutzerbewertungen
Vergleiche Funktionen mit Alternativen
Mit Alternativen vergleichen

Kategorien

Videos und Anleitungen

Videos und Anleitungen

Zusätzliche Informationen für Bitbucket

Zusätzliche Informationen für Bitbucket

Schlüssel-Features von Bitbucket

  • Enterprise-Git Repository-Managementtool
  • Entwickelt für JIRA
  • Im Team arbeiten
  • Kostenloser Desktop-Client für Git und Mercurial.
  • Pull-Requests und Code-Reviews
  • Quellcode-Einsichten
  • Unbegrenzte private Speicher

Bitbucket Häufig gestellte Fragen

Bitbucket Häufig gestellte Fragen

Weiter unter folgen häufig gestellte Fragen über Bitbucket.

F. Welche Preispläne bietet Bitbucket an?

Bitbucket bietet folgende Kostenpläne an:

Gratis Testen: Verfügbar

F. Was sind die Hauptfunktionen von Bitbucket?

Bitbucket bietet die folgenden Funktionen:

  • Entwickelt für JIRA
  • Enterprise-Git Repository-Managementtool
  • Kostenloser Desktop-Client für Git und Mercurial.
  • Pull-Requests und Code-Reviews
  • Quellcode-Einsichten
  • Unbegrenzte private Speicher
  • Im Team arbeiten

F. Wer sind die typischen Nutzer von Bitbucket?

Bitbucket hat die folgenden typischen Kunden:

Freie Mitarbeiter, Großunternehmen, Mittlere Unternehmen, Non-Profit, Öffentliche Verwaltung, Kleine Unternehmen

F: Welche Sprachen werden von Bitbucket unterstützt?

Bitbucket unterstützt die folgenden Sprachen:

Englisch

F. Welche Preispläne bietet Bitbucket an?

Wir haben keine Informationen über die Preispläne von Bitbucket

F. Unterstützt Bitbucket mobile Geräte?

Wir haben keine Informationen darüber, welche Geräte Bitbucket unterstützt

F. Mit welchen anderen Applikationen integriert Bitbucket?

Bitbucket kann in folgende Anwendungen integriert werden:

Airbrake, Bitium, Broadsoft Team-One, CA Flowdock, Cube, Datadog, Glip, MeisterTask, Slack, Sprintly

F. Welche Varianten der Kundenbetreuung bietet Bitbucket an?

Bitbucket bietet folgende Optionen für Kundensupport:

Online-Support